News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Lurker from Mars

06/06/10 8:53 PM

#72535 RE: fourkids_9pets #72534

The sell off, beginning launch day of a $100mil product 3-4 days BEFORE the divy spinoff, which had been talked about for 2 years according to a former IR, was not interesting enough, just the 2-4 pro flippers tooling the pps and phantom FTD's was?

look at OBV in SEP 09 and OBV in May 2010...notice anything?
Look at accum in SEP 09 and again in 2010, notice a difference? One says selling the other says dilution....

around NOV 09 dilution started and picked up in 2nd qtr 2010...shares were already sold by then and it never recovered...no shorting...just plain selling...over a billions worth....first insiders, then public...pro flippers and P&D crews worked the whole time...then changed sides to take pps down so they could buy "PP" when EXPO was convinced to go that route...

ahh, but nothing I haven't stated before...Funny, the SEC doesn't need my help...must not be what happened....Preferred to common to "hold"????? ROFLMAO.....give me a break....

WHY WOULD ANYONE SELL ON THE HEELS OF $100mil/yr REVS???? Cuz it was BS and to be a divy spinoff...a pinks pump card for newbies..They LOVE divies!!!!!

I got several...all scams...I know...learned my lessons....

icon url

Stock_Barber

06/06/10 9:34 PM

#72536 RE: fourkids_9pets #72534

I think this entire topic is borderline OT, but since it has been allowed to stay for a few days, I guess this *incident* is fair game for discussion...

You are suggesting that the post of an SEC conversation was untrue or misrepresented... and that was followed immediately by a couple of trades (total about 8M or $4k) in 13 minutes. Are you suggesting that they were all sells and a direct reaction to the post?

Did it even move the price?

What is the significance of those 13 minutes vs. the next few days before clarity was provided on the Form D issue?