News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Scandle34

05/31/10 9:47 PM

#46164 RE: PaperProphet #46158

he publicly stated the name of a refinery that would pay WTI-$3 and revised it on the Islechem report to WTI+$2. As to why he is not pounding the table...? he's not a stock promoter.

He realizes that there is an order to things:
-- process [x]
-- permits <--- YOU ARE HERE.
-- production
-- profits

promotion will happen as a result of these.


Since you jumped into libel with both feet and no safety net perhaps your DD should start with an IDLE but fully operational machine waiting on environmental permit issuance.

The Islechem report very clearly spells out the degree of marketability. My experience through my employer's sister companies tells me that transporting the product is a no-brainer. Common sense says there is a market.

My conservative nature says they will have costs about 3x what is suggested on this board and even with sale points $10 below WTI it's obscenely viable.
icon url

Rawnoc

05/31/10 9:50 PM

#46166 RE: PaperProphet #46158

You have yet to state a single "viable" red flag. Your best home run attempt was to say that JBII(E) lied about being able to turn Oxygen into hydrocarbons, but the problem is the only person on this planet that seems to have ever claimed that is you. Neither John nor Islechem ever did.
icon url

redf

05/31/10 10:11 PM

#46170 RE: PaperProphet #46158

If that tank floats put it out in the gulf you wont need no plastic.fwiw.
icon url

Zardiw

06/01/10 11:40 AM

#46260 RE: PaperProphet #46158

Wrong. Since the company wasn't even formed until April 2009.

From the PR's, he said he was ready to produce last spring. What happened?

Care to provide a link to a PR that says that?


z
icon url

Zardiw

06/01/10 11:44 AM

#46263 RE: PaperProphet #46158

Since when is 'Diesel' not commercially viable?



z