Replies to post #307154 on CMKM Diamonds Inc (fka CMKX)

[johnsmith123]

Stoecklein had his issues:

remember this Stockwatch quote "CMKM, represented by Donald Stoecklein, a lawyer with some regulatory baggage of his own, contested the SEC administrative action".

But notice this conversation with Maheu, there's some very interesting reading here that basically defies all of Hodges claims and aligns mire with Tyler's claim that CMKX was a vast fraud

faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1089.html

Here's a few good highlights

MARCH 11, 2007 INTERVIEW:

MAHEU: Mark, how many people in your life have you seen, who without even realizing, live in a world of wishful thinking?

FAULK: A lot. There are a lot of shareholders in CMKX who are like that.

MAHEU: Reality does not exist in their world. I have been kinda weaned in that world because when Hughes… I was his alter ego for 15 years. When he went to the point of isolation I saw what lack of reality can do; it causes a lot of problems. It gets to the point where if they remove themselves from reality, unfortunately from that aspect reality exists in their minds… luckily, reality still exists outside. That happens, unfortunately.

FAULK: Do you think that happened with Urban to a degree then too?

MAHEU: Exactly.


.....

JUNE 12, 2007 INTERVIEW


MARK: Did you at any time have any involvement, directly or behind the scenes, with any Federal enforcement agencies orchestrating any type of sting operation, or trapping naked short sellers?

MAHEU: Absolutely not.

FAULK: No involvement with naked short selling or negotiating any type of cash settlement for CMKX shareholders, or any type of settlement?

MAHEU: Absolutely not.

FAULK: And no current involvement?

MAHEU: No.