John Bordynuik on IsleChem
Robin: "IMO, a quality PR from Islechem should include the size of processor tested, hard numbers about output and efficiency; any variables for feedstock used and general terms (only) for catalyst, along with validation that the residues qualify for landfill."
Back in December we did not engage Islechem to provide a reported detailed as this. We did not have the large processor completely assembled and did not look for a "user friendly" report. We asked them to verify our findings and performance. I believe engaging URS to do a comprehensive report after monitoring the factory for a month and write a report based on 30,000 foot data vs. a report on molecular data. That information would be useful for analysts, funds, investors, and P2O JV's.