John Bordynuik on IsleChem
Robin: "IMO, a quality PR from Islechem should include the size of processor tested, hard numbers about output and efficiency; any variables for feedstock used and general terms (only) for catalyst, along with validation that the residues qualify for landfill."
Back in December we did not engage Islechem to provide a reported detailed as this. We did not have the large processor completely assembled and did not look for a "user friendly" report. We asked them to verify our findings and performance. I believe engaging URS to do a comprehensive report after monitoring the factory for a month and write a report based on 30,000 foot data vs. a report on molecular data. That information would be useful for analysts, funds, investors, and P2O JV's.
To know the truth, one must get rid of knowledge, as nothing is more powerful and creative than emptiness.
