News Focus
News Focus
icon url

RDG013

03/23/10 10:30 PM

#60725 RE: mariner78 #60721

If we are reporting with fully audited financials, it will be far easier to attract real money(assuming that the CU% is now more than adequate with the changes made)
icon url

74stingray

03/23/10 10:34 PM

#60726 RE: mariner78 #60721

I was thinking it would be better for the PPS to have the SS removed asap to prevent further shorting, then followed with proper financial statements. However if the proper statements only took a couple weeks it wouldn't matter, should be enough of us longs here to keep the shorts at bay.

I know I'm only in CPRK this past month, been watching them a few months, but I'm not here to flip, minimum 1 year before i sell any shares, even then i would only look to take away my initial investment allowing the remaining free shares ride it out. that being said, I haven't finished adding just yet, waiting to see how a few of the others I'm currently in turn out.

icon url

the fox 52

03/24/10 8:55 AM

#60740 RE: mariner78 #60721

"CM said P/S doesn't require audited financials, but we were going that route, because that's what real companies do. "

ahmen bro.

With a concentrated effort on an IT infrastructure that will provide PS compliance and posture cprk for BB status.

The main near term goal, other than CFP process, is the compliance. cprk needs to get rid of that damn "stop sign". That will significantly limit the shorters.