Replies to post #128 on China Metro-Rural Holdings Ltd fka CNR

[mick]

need to study this some

re;
Dear Ricky, please give MHJ shareholders 40% interest in the new proposed reverse merger...

If MHJ already had over $164 million of total shareholder equity in Sept of 2009 or close to $26 per share then a price rise to a fairer valuation could bring in larger investors if it moved to or above the $50 million dollar market cap...
answer;
scenario sounds good.

Would need to hit around $8 per share to pass that $50 million market cap...Considering about 6,383,000 shares outstanding...
answer;
like three times plus @ $50 market cap='s $26

Still would be only about a third of stated total shareholder equity value from the company in Sept. 2009 6-K filings...

If the price moves up people can request Ricky to consider approval of others before rushing to new ventures without letting all review them closely...Not saying that a filing of info and a vote plan to shareholders won't come before a reverse merger can occur...
abswer;
this could be in their mgmt planning.

But a definitive agreement sounds like some things are in motion...

Don't current MHJ shareholders deserve the best deal for their investment though even if it means getting a better percentage in the reverse merger planned?...
answer;
i like...

The IR question submission area on the company website works...
answer;
does mhj have I.R. person or company rep.?

Why shouldn't MHJ shareholders get 40% ownership in the reverse merger because the company is already listed...Metro China-Rural Limited is pursuing public listing...
answer;
i'd vote fer that.

And most would feel more prosperous...LJ

MHJ already has Pearls...
answer;
i wonder where stored at?

[mick]

maybe just tip of iceburg in planning into a larger company this year.