News Focus
News Focus
Followers 157
Posts 36519
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/01/2004

Re: mick post# 126

Saturday, 02/20/2010 11:26:30 PM

Saturday, February 20, 2010 11:26:30 PM

Post# of 265
Dear Ricky, please give MHJ shareholders 40% interest in the new proposed reverse merger...

If MHJ already had over $164 million of total shareholder equity in Sept of 2009 or close to $26 per share then a price rise to a fairer valuation could bring in larger investors if it moved to or above the $50 million dollar market cap...

Would need to hit around $8 per share to pass that $50 million market cap...Considering about 6,383,000 shares outstanding...

Still would be only about a third of stated total shareholder equity value from the company in Sept. 2009 6-K filings...

If the price moves up people can request Ricky to consider approval of others before rushing to new ventures without letting all review them closely...Not saying that a filing of info and a vote plan to shareholders won't come before a reverse merger can occur...

But a definitive agreement sounds like some things are in motion...

Don't current MHJ shareholders deserve the best deal for their investment though even if it means getting a better percentage in the reverse merger planned?...

The IR question submission area on the company website works...

Why shouldn't MHJ shareholders get 40% ownership in the reverse merger because the company is already listed...Metro China-Rural Limited is pursuing public listing...

And most would feel more prosperous...LJ

MHJ already has Pearls...

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today