Why dont you do the board a favor and back up some of the movements in price with a little DD and implement it in those famous charts. We had a big gap up and Clay was yappin about it was the result of consolidation. Sure, i guess the EC getting appointed didnt have anything to do with it. Did Clay mention the EC? uh no. That is the problem with chartists. They believe all that BS until something happens that they cant draw a line to and then you dont hear from them for a while. If the price continues down, you'll be chompin at the bit about gap theory without one clue why it is headed down. If it goes up to a line you cant connect, it's 'blue sky' (which is a chartist's definition of 'i have no friggin clue what will happen next'), if it goes down, then it's this day support or that day support.
You have no clue what it will do tomorrow based on your chart and you wont even admit it.
If I had the amount of shares you have, and remember i know how many it is, then i guess i could be care free and loose lipped with the doom and gloom comments. If you had the amount I have or some others, I'd expect you would choose your verbage more carefully. You're reminding me of Arnold.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
