Bud Burrell's commentary was tendentious and meretricious
Exactly!
" C." misquotes Holder's speech with three sentences. The rest of the article is all about C. and the same self serving agenda he's been spewing ad nauseam.
How can someone seriously discuss financial crimes without devoting at least a paragraph about the mortgage crisis? C. has no interest discussing the issue because his bias is slanted in one direction, imo.
Obviously the familysecuritymatters web site did not proofread C.'s article.