News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Wildman262

11/12/04 3:04 PM

#57641 RE: go-kitesurf #57622

gokite, excellent diagram and explanation.
icon url

dig space

11/15/04 11:08 AM

#57784 RE: go-kitesurf #57622

gokite, again I'm not going to bother going through this point by point. I never said "NTRU TSS was interoperable and therefore Wave was trumped" It seems in every other post I say Wave provides a small important part that is currently THEIR niche.
Trumpable, but not yet trumped part. I've said that about 20 times.
Next, I have drawn this diagram about half-a dozen times:

TPM<>TSS<>CSP<>MSCAPI/PKS11

I have said that NTRUs CTSS' ability to operate on all TPM was an important component of interoperability.

Doma said I was wrong, that ALL TSSs work with ANY chip.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4542403

Rachel questioned that,
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4542496

doma backed off and sounded undecided, (doma’s words were “maybe” and "perhaps")
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4542643

It seems the venom that you and others seem to be harboring towards my content is your notion that I have been peddling the idea that Wave CSP is not necessary for interoperability. That is the opposite of what I’ve been saying.

A few posts to remind you of that fact (and not a single one of these posts says anything about NTRU trumping Wave. You made that up):

“Wave confers to a platform the feature on interoperability.”
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4411284

“Wave offers a ****component**** to TCG that enables interoperability”
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4411545

“Wave offers a small important part of the TCG platform”
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4509989

“Wave IS currently A missing link.”
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4516384

“I believe Wave is going to be a small important piece. Doma believes Wave is going to be a big important piece.”
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4318856


Otherwise your post appears to be another iteration of what is presumably common knowledge at this point.

You seem to back peddle notably when referring to coffee, but I think we both know that … similar to doma’s “maybe .. perhaps” in both cases you retreat into the notion that the point doesn’t matter rather than whether or not it is accurate.

Regards,

Dig Space.