Replies to post #12857 on MedClean Technologies, Inc.(fka MCLN)

[Slyder75]

Piano's posts are conjecture, they aren't rooted in TA or actual facts by the company. Therefore, I see them as...

Well, blather, till we here from the company.

let me remind everyone what one poignant poster provided:

An exerpt from this article: http://biomedreports.com/articles/most-popular/19782-part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html

"Our manufacturing and installation bandwidth is running at full capacity," says David Laky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, "but that's a nice problem to have and we're actively making changes to accommodate more orders."

"We're excited about the collaboration with MedAssets and they have definitely enabled us to provide our solutions to an expanding base of customers,” adds Chairman Grisanti.

The leaders appear particularly proud that their system meets the stringent and rigorous requirements of MedAssets as well as the tough regulatory requirements for processing medical waste in many states, including New Jersey- where customers in both the pharmaceutical and medical fields are required to minimize liability and protect the environment more strictly than just about any other state in the country.

Two points here:

1. You can’t say those things and mislead investors; and
2. It should give investors confidence in the company’s current situation. This management doesn’t grant interviews and pump their stock constantly with PRs, which I guess some morons are begging for. They are focused on their business. This interview was conducted between November 15th and November 30th, as this was published on 12/1/2009.

Results are pending folks, read the 10Q.

[DiligentInvestor092738]

I agree with you, louie, in that investors will naturally over-analyze the positives and dismiss the negatives; that is just part of human nature. I also agree that when you come to a board like this where most members are long MCLN and post something that says MCLN will fall, you will get some backlash from others; however, piano says these negative things without any analysis of charts or anything else. Whereas the longs are speculating that MCLN will rise for a variety of reasons (great management, positive 3rd quarter, upcoming 4Q results), piano doesn't provide any analysis for his bearish stance- he simply denies what the longs have to say and dismisses our DD as weak.

I think what everyone on this board must understand is that if you post something, whether bearish or bullish WE DON'T CARE, please provide reasons and meaningful analysis. It seems to me that piano hasn't provide meaningful reason as to why he's bearish, therefore igniting this post war between members.

And let me remind everybody exactly what we're "investing" (if you can call it this)in with MCLN: spectacular management and a high value-adding product. The reason I am skeptical to use the word "invest" is because this IS an ultra penny stock, i.e. we're SPECULATING that share price will rise or fall, based on what little information we have.

All the best