Pink I'm simply giving my observations.
So I posted.
I posted it here figuring it wouldn't get deleted and because I felt it was relevant info for those looking at the company plus JB mentioned owning some.
Free shares is a great way to play it JB- nice job protecting yourself AND being in for the ride, I never got the guts to get in.
All this said, I'm not out to get someone and have no big agenda in that I have no shares and am not short it. BUT I also will try to share info that I think is not being presented if I have time.
The company can still make money even if the catalyst doesn't overcome the difficulties I mention (obviously the catalyst can't do anything about chlorine by definition).
They can market with upfront cash payments to the company, they can sell the technology to the highest bidder etc.
One thing that surprised me is no one ever posted about all these plastic to energy companies that haven't made it even when they purported efficiencies approaching 100%.
Another thing that surprised me is how tricky it is to find out WHY many of these companies didn't make it big if they could be so efficient with the conversion. There's soemthing that sin't being clearly stated IMO. Otherwise people would be making bank all over the place with plastic to fuel processes IMO.
The obvious question was why hadn't they succeeded. The temps of the processes were taking place under 400 degrees C so the dioxin fear was likely mitigated. But plastic has more than oil in it so obviously there will be some contamination unless these things are removed. That's why I mentioned chlorine as one potential problem.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
