News Focus
News Focus
icon url

kruy

12/18/09 11:18 PM

#128575 RE: glaszman #128572

and the SFC has/had the abuiltiy to subpeona Megas if they wanted, but they are obviously glad to close this and make it go away.

I addressed that before..did you miss it...why would the SEC do anything else but revoke the stock and leave it at that considering how people want to obnoxiously defend there CEO and claim outrageous government conspiracies..you yourself claim the agencies are corrupt.

Why bother when the "ball is in Megas's court"...and he won't respond..nothing further is needed and you got your wish..and you have no one to blame but Megas...and it saves the agencies time money and effort..which translates into taxpayer savings that would be wasted on yet another worthless penny shell game.

As for SFC protocol..who are you to say??..the SFC can comment all they want..and they did..obviously to lot's more than me..as..Ummm Ohbull and crew...instead they would rather solict money that release what the SFC was commenting on to anyone that asked.
icon url

ohbull2000

12/19/09 12:43 AM

#128586 RE: glaszman #128572

Good job glaszman! And to that other comment...

from kruy that we knew about the Shapiro response, LIKE HE SAYS HE DID...Guastini, Burns' replacement, just sent it out this past Wed. the 16th.!

No one had seen it, on this board prior to Guastini deciding to release it, prove otherwise kruy! Now you've also stated kruy that the SFC will confirm your other statements you've been making, fine...prove it... because there's nobody at Grassley's office that thinks the SFC, or other, would do that.