My point was that she understood you, but you seemed not to consider her point, and just pushed yours.
Maybe, so your frustration.
That your, I tried to communicate one thing, and Steph heard (and debated)
quite a different thing, was not correct. On rereading my post it seems clear to me.
Didn't think i had to state exactly, that the article i posted did not even suggest that the media darlings
mentioned there had been 'attacked' by the left. My question was designed to indirectly make the point.
Your point was that if the left had not, did not, does not, whatever -- criticize, poke
fun at, "attack", Palin, then she would not have been and would not still be a media darling.
Steph, saw that as ridiculous and told you why, i agreed with, Steph, explained
why, and thought the article might encourage you to reconsider your position.
Have a good day, wbmw.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
