Make me understand..this is a respectful question. If they were clean registered shares, why is the SEC investigating legal registered shares getting into the market?
The perception of a company's potential + a company's risk = PPS
Just trying to understand both sides of the equation, not just one.
Look at the PR from yesterday............if IPWG had done something wrong they would not be proceeding along the lines that they have.It just makes no sense to do so.If rumors are correct they are Quoting the SEC in their complaint saying they did nothing wrong.
Who would follow such a path unless it was true.IMO........since you are an investor that wants to know the truth you have to be open to what the company says when they believe that there are games benign played here.
Their story adds up..................its the other guys in the hot seat.
gappa dos....ipwginvestor stated they were from the meeting minutes..
LET'S GET TO THE NUMBER 1 ISSUE FOR NOW - the dtcc "chill". spoke w. peter, john, brian (grombeck - financial consultant with company --- very very very sharp), and mr. grayson - the sec lawyer for company. seems they are close to a deal with dtcc. problem involves 168 million unregistered shares - 50 million are still held by signature leisure - the other 118 million sold on the market "illegally". so if ipwg is willing to take 168 million shares out of circulation - either by retiring them, or restriciting them, dtcc should have no further problems. hoping to get resolution of problem by end of next week.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
