News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Ocstreet

10/22/09 1:06 PM

#111756 RE: gold-nugget #111753

I was at work and logged onto the call right after that happened. Can someone recap for me what the FDIC "threatened"?

Thanks, I wasn't able to log on until right before the phones went silent for a bit. So, I pretty much missed everything.
icon url

DudeBug

10/22/09 1:25 PM

#111798 RE: gold-nugget #111753

I totally agree with your attorney! I'm sure all attorneys are shaking their heads right now over that tactic.

IMO... JPM had no muscle in the game today so they brought their big pal, the FDIC, to flex theirs!!

Have some faith in Judge Walrath's knowledge and ability to determine what are the real facts and what is BS.
icon url

mordicai

10/22/09 1:31 PM

#111817 RE: gold-nugget #111753

On the day the holding company filed bankruptcy the deposit became property of the estate under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. Without more, the bankruptcy court determines the outcome of the deposit, not the fdic. But here the fdic answered in bankruptcy the adversary interpleader filed by JPM over the deposit. THe fdic at that time conceded for this case that the bankruptcy court determines the outcome not the fdic. Whatever fdic could have aruged had it not done this is now irrelevant because it submitted to the jurisdiction of the court . Law of the case.