News Focus
News Focus
icon url

VivaLasVegas

10/15/09 12:24 PM

#108550 RE: climberprof #108549

Well I do not see how ONE SET OF COMMONS could be DIFFERENT than say us... another set of commons.

NOPE all Commons are the SAME or we should be able to sue and win a case against TPG in the future.

It's just like the FEDERAL RESERVE pulling their money out of LEHMAN and letting the other Creditors Rot. There will be fallout. If you're the same class of investor, then you are all in the same boat.


Unless the laws are tossed out. Then we're all in a real world of hurt.


Cheers
icon url

Desperado90

10/15/09 12:29 PM

#108551 RE: climberprof #108549

Then TPG and WMI would be sued for discrimination. The fourteenth amendment guarantee equal protection. Therefore, the contract between WMI and TPG would be violating this clear protective protection.

Now there could be a separate contract between TPG and WMI to be paid but at this period that would be discriminatory to other holders of the same preferred shares that TPG converted to commons.

TPG got robbed in broad daylight.

GLTY.

We have the constitution supporting our arguments.

Equal Protection and Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.