News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gfp927z

10/04/09 8:30 PM

#29161 RE: Aiming4 #29160

Aiming, For the 'no' vote, it should stipulate that the vote is contingent on Varney inking a deal prior to Nov 23 (either a pharma deal or a MA/buyout). If a deal occurs prior to Nov 23, the 'no' vote would become a 'yes' to increase the shares.













icon url

food4thought

10/04/09 8:38 PM

#29162 RE: Aiming4 #29160

Aiming,
It's important to get the results well prior to the special meeting to be provided to Varney. Ombow or Jerry can e-mail him the results. I do think he checks in here periodically but a confirmation of delivery would be nice. I as a shareholder would love to hear his reaction to this. It would be wise to include the disclaimer in the poll, would you vote no/yes if a partnership deal was/was not inked prior to the special meeting. My share vote depends solely on the lack of a development between now and then. I think it would be wise to ask for exact share count as well rather than a wide range of options. Given my belief that nothing will happen, I offer a 353k vote of shares to the nay. F4T.