News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Virtual Drew

10/01/09 7:36 PM

#222854 RE: janice shell #222848

And why wire money when the contract isn't signed?

HEY SOAPY, can you send us a copy of them "fill in the blank" terms you were talking about?!?

Even if you do have them, they aren't signed!
icon url

albus

10/01/09 7:37 PM

#222856 RE: janice shell #222848

as long as the party being sued signed he contract then its enforceable against them if they rec'd benefit - every state and federal court
icon url

SDBob09

10/01/09 7:41 PM

#222863 RE: janice shell #222848

Janice? You're reaching, lol. I know you're no fan of Spongetech, but even you have to admit that GFGU is completely without merit here.

To paraphrase, "SPNG has been publicly accused of identity theft so we're keeping your 1.75mm"??

Stephen King couldn't write this script...
icon url

UnSaKreD

10/01/09 7:52 PM

#222883 RE: janice shell #222848

I'm a law student and if consideration is transferred and accepted it in many ways is a binding contract.
icon url

Spinosaurus

10/02/09 2:20 AM

#223141 RE: janice shell #222848

I do not have it in front of me, but I recall that gufu in the 8K both acknowledged that it received the funds from spng and said it did not receive them. And that it will return the money. And that it won't. And then referred to statments re the pensley matter which are contested. And citing impropriety on spng's part for gufu to rescind.

At the very least a double speak, double confusing 8K, poorly worded, by I hope, not by any attorney. It would seem to raise more issues in spng's favor than to assist gufu in anything.

All IMO. Peace and Serenity. spino