wadi: Maybe I'm mistaken, but aren't only O/S effected by a r/s? Then assuming that is the case, and if the A/S of 900m would not have been reduced effective 9/22, then wouldn't the A/S still be 900m after 9/22?
So, in effect mgmt. is reducing A/S by 2/3 from what it was --because r/s do not effect A/S. What am I missing here?
So, You are looking at the A/S reduction to 300m post split as if it is a disguised 30 Bil. pre-split. And I do not think one can view it that way because r/s do not effect A/S. I guess my logic is different than yours. Spino