Malko, there are many on this board who hang on your every word. Why do you choose to ignore what management has stated in filings and on conference calls. The triggers were specifically named. Not by a type of company but by name. While I am happy about the Toshiba license, it has no more force with the arbitration panel than the Sanyo license unless of course they were named in the contract.
Malko14 , I hope you are doing well but I disagree with your theory that Toshiba is a OEM and could be a trigger in the arbitration.
IMO one of the arguments Nokia is probably suggesting is that ERICY was a trigger but ERICY/ Sony is not.
In the 1999 agreement with Nokia IMO there were companies named that could trigger Nokia’s responsibility but also IMO there’s no way Nokia would have allowed IDCC to include OEM’s like Toshiba who has a 0.7 % share of handset sales in 2003.
Malko, you posted the following. So what tune shall we dance to, "When Johnny Comes Marching Home". Or to some James Brown, "Papa's got a brand new bag". Or to a home grown theme titled "Jorma O is Busted".
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
