News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Webwyrm

08/27/09 8:35 PM

#176575 RE: whirly #176574

I personally value the debate. Helps me solidify what i already know in my head.. and hopefully help other investors.
icon url

no_BS_plz

08/27/09 8:35 PM

#176576 RE: whirly #176574

The only reason I respond is because I have forgotten more about corporate accounting and audits than Harvard taught him, and I do not want him to think he is getting anything over on our strong shareholders.

But you are right, I believe most of the "real" shareholders already have limited his credibility to somewhere between -1 and 1.
icon url

ckayela

08/27/09 8:36 PM

#176578 RE: whirly #176574

I don't think he has the $150,000-$200,000 to cover if he does short it.(conservatively)
icon url

SRV-90

08/27/09 8:37 PM

#176579 RE: whirly #176574

It's because if we don't then they feel they have made their point and when someone is posting misleading or wrong information it's best to set the record straight.

Indeed spongetech's fair value is not reflected in the pps but after the 10-K we should see some ground covered in that department.

Yes, their promotional marketing and awareness campaign is quite amazing. They are getting the name recognition out there in the most amazing way.

Opus
icon url

miami_vice

08/27/09 9:15 PM

#176595 RE: whirly #176574

"For this company NOT to go to a dollar a share they'd have to be lying about everything they've PRed."


And with the hiring of Deloitte & Touche' I think we got the answer regarding any doubts about that.
icon url

44N47A

08/27/09 11:40 PM

#176732 RE: whirly #176574

Well said.