News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ican70

08/26/09 12:58 PM

#24341 RE: gyspsy #24340

okay Gypsy I hear what you are saying. He carried the torch for many years and he is under the instruction of his clients.

ican
icon url

shisya

08/26/09 1:01 PM

#24342 RE: gyspsy #24340

gyspsy: when do you intend to be back?
icon url

ronpopeil

08/26/09 1:07 PM

#24344 RE: gyspsy #24340

it would be nice if you could share this info with us given that time is somewhat of the essence. i don't think it benefits us to keep this info from everyone.
icon url

Bourbon_on_my_cornflakes

08/26/09 1:46 PM

#24349 RE: gyspsy #24340

That's about the biggest tease I've seen on this board. How can this secret information be useful unless you get it to the judge re Gordon? Get it out there man, the hearing is on 9/11.

If "they" have been paid off, get it out there, or at least threaten to do so. Nothing could blow this case as wide open as evidence of a fixed outcome.


That said, I think the plaintiffs should be barred from bidding on the properties or buying them from a proxy. If they can only benefit by maximizing unitholder value for all unitholders, that would be best.
icon url

Lebaneseproud

08/26/09 11:57 PM

#24355 RE: gyspsy #24340

Well gyspsy the hearing is 9-11 so afraid your supposed info will be worthless if the judge cant hear it. If you have info tell it to the interveners so that they can bring it up at hearing if its found to be credible. If you dont then you shouldnt mention it