H. Mr. Mangiapane's Motion for Production of Evidence Favorable to the Accused should be granted.
The prosecution argues that Mr. Mangiapane's Motion for Production of Evidence Favorable to the Accused should be denied as moot insofar as it alludes to Brady material since the prosecution fully intends to provide such material. Response, page 27, paragraph 1.
Again, since the prosecution fully intends to disclose such material, it should not object to an order. This is especially true insofar as the seven specific categories of evidence requested by Mr. Mangiapane is concerned. Motion, pages 1 - 4.
The prosecution argues that generic requests for Brady material should be denied unless Mr. Mangiapane can show that he has been denied specific Brady material. Response, page 27, paragraph 2.
The prosecution does not disclose which of Mr. Mangiapane's requests it deemed "generic." Once discovery commences in this case, Mr. Mangiapane will certainly bring any specific requests for discovery to the attention of the prosecution and the Court.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
