News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mr Wizard a1a

08/22/09 10:16 PM

#42343 RE: ghcnj #42342

False name calling does not answer the question.

So it is the buyer's stock which continues to be traded. The buyer was Zenergy? But, is it not PTPCs stock, later that symbol changed to ZENG which continued to be traded. How does that all fit with your Reverse Acquisition?

Paradigm changed its name to Zenergy. That's why Zenergy is a seven year old Delaware Corporation.
icon url

Mr Wizard a1a

08/22/09 10:28 PM

#42345 RE: ghcnj #42342

This statement is name calling AND false. "Since you were an insider with the old scam shell that used to be here do you know what was paid out to the old owners or the "Big Seller" ???"

I licensed my patent to Paradigm - the private company - for 5 years. It later went public. That was my only involvement. I made NO company decisions, held NO position, was paid for NO work for the company, held NO stock,etc. Frisker was turnkey to Paradigm. Your statement is a lie -intentional.

The question asked does not involve any of the dodges above, but just asks how your claim reconsoiles with what happened with this merger.