Right on Tim.
I will look a little deeper into the link you provided,But I havea darn good feel as to why AIM works(mosty of us do, I think).
In the meantime I have come to think that the problem of a fromal way of analysing AIM is much easier as I first thought(prior coudiness on clear thinking). See message # 3712.
I think the problem is to identify what is is presisely what that is to be done! When you talk about:
means-reverting log-normal variant simulated signal
I get the shivers! Maybe a coincdence, as there is cold air blowing trough my open window!
That stuff you mentioned is not included in the 3 things I know about math!
I would prefer first, for my own peace of mind, have to know what I am trying to achive. I am not yet clear on that.
Conrad