News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mehedi

07/29/09 6:26 PM

#83715 RE: Ocstreet #83713

I think you misread the point. he is talking about the smoking gun WMI is aware of!
icon url

diamondguru-one

07/29/09 6:29 PM

#83716 RE: Ocstreet #83713

maybe YOU should do your "DD" alittle better.....ever hear of "DISCOVERY"????? YOUR telling me that "WAMU'S TEAM" didnt show the JUDGE DISCOVERY ????? you better dig !!! this JUDGE isnt small potatos bud.....I WILL SAY AS "FACT" !!!! the judge saw EVIDENCE in this area.....SO "OUTRAGEOUS"!!!! you bet !!!! JPM/FDIC is SMOKED !!!! please dig...and do "DD" better !!!! Goooooo WAMUS TEAM !!!
icon url

Desperado90

07/29/09 6:41 PM

#83723 RE: Ocstreet #83713

To answer your question and back up diamondguru's assertion before a judge issues a search warrant you have to prove that there's a minimum of Reason to issue the warrant.

For a Judge to order discovery, the Judge has been presented with evidence to prove there's a smoking gun.

Also even if WMI Lawyers have evidence, they cannot present it until they get discovery or the evidence can be kicked out due to some technicality.

Any lawyer worth their salt would never go down this rabbit hole and seek discovery if they didn't have the smoking gun.
icon url

Lawrence 147

07/29/09 6:45 PM

#83727 RE: Ocstreet #83713

WMI only needs a few documents and if what JPM produces is not consistent they will be in some big time trouble. If what WMI provides is damaging to JPM and JPM claims no knowledge who do you think the judge will favor in her decision?
icon url

Jestiron

07/29/09 10:11 PM

#83792 RE: Ocstreet #83713

chip is back. eom