I have a question for you, not looking to badger but interested in what you feel about this: It is evident that we went to war without full international support and as stated by some "we don't need no stinking UN!". Yet we are depending on them and IAEI or whatever to keep Iran and N.Korea in check with respect towards WMD's. So here is the question; Don't you find it odd that we attack a nation without WMD's, but do nothing about the ones with them and have threatened to use them? And why is it that we don't need the UN for Iraq, but we expect them to keep Iran and NK in check? Don't you feel that these rogue nations are a far greater threat to our way of life and if we were going to pre-emptively strike someone, why Iraq and not Iran or NK?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
