News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

08/25/04 10:09 PM

#87031 RE: chisox pat #87029

Of course they wouldn't.

Why would CMKX pay dividends on the NSS if there are any?? They would not.

If there WERE any shorts out there, and if Urbie wanted to "help" them cover, he'd just sell 'em shares.
icon url

Pedro2004

08/25/04 10:28 PM

#87057 RE: chisox pat #87029

'chisox pat'


--------------------------------------------------------

Re: He does not seem to get it, or at least pretends not to.



Answer:

Actually, I thought the same about you.

You just don't get it! Which is OK
Or
Your just playing games.

I can not make this more clear, than what I am about to post below:

//////////

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040719/196042_1.html

CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will also receive 40 billion shares of CIM stock which CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will distribute pro rata as a dividend to all CMKM shareholders of record on August 31, 2004.

The key words are:
PRO RATA
ALL CMKM SHAREHOLDERS


Definition for PRO RATA
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pro-rata.asp

////////////

If you don't understand what I just wrote, I am sorry.
I have no other way of explaining this in a simpler – common format.


--------------------------------------------------------



Re: if the dividend ratio is correct it seems to me that the only way they would have to cover the shartes is if Urbie and Co. actually naked shorted their own stock. It sounds ridiculous, but what about this whole mess doesn't?



Please do some research on
1. Short Sales
2. Naked Short Sales
3. Corporate Share Structure

Study in depth these 3 areas and get back with me.
I will be more than happy to help you understand.

Hand in there 'chisox pat'

As Sterling writes: All Is Well