Replies to post #104 on Veris Gold Corp (fka VG)

[searchlight]

Jul 09, 2009 12:16 ET
Golden Eagle Files Claims Against Yukon-Nevada, Queenstake USA and Queenstake Canada for $40 Million Lost Profit on Breach of Contract at Jerritt Canyon Mill
Punitive Damages Are Also Being Sought
Highlighted Links

Golden Eagle International
SALT LAKE CITY, UT--(Marketwire - July 9, 2009) - Golden Eagle International, Inc. (OTCBB: MYNG) reported today that it has filed a $40 million counterclaim and third-party complaints against Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp. ("Yukon-Nevada"), Queenstake Resources USA, Inc. ("Queenstake USA"), Queenstake Resources Ltd. ("Queenstake Canada") (both wholly owned subsidiaries of Yukon-Nevada) and Francois Marland ("Marland"), a French citizen and Yukon-Nevada investor. The counterclaim and third-party complaints were filed in the Fourth District Court for Elko County, Nevada, together with an answer to Queenstake USA's complaint filed on June 10, 2009 (See, Golden Eagle's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. SEC on June 12, 2009) and can be found as an exhibit to a Current Report filed on Form 8-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (U.S. SEC) on July 9, 2009: http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000869531
Fraud, Misrepresentation, Material Omissions and Deceptive Practices Alleged in Breach
The counterclaim alleges that by a pattern of fraud, misrepresentation, material omissions and deceptive business practices Queenstake USA induced Golden Eagle to enter into a mill operating agreement on October 14, 2008, which called for Golden Eagle to operate the Jerritt Canyon gold mill located 50 miles north of Elko, Nevada, for a 5-year period and provide extensive services to prepare the mill for operations and bring it into environmental compliance. The counterclaim further alleges that Queenstake USA continued between October 2008 and June 2009, through fraudulent and deceptive means, to induce Golden Eagle to continue to provide its administrative services and contract with up to 82 employees, providers, suppliers and third-party contractors, which resulted in a liability for costs incurred by Golden Eagle, and administrative fees owed to Golden Eagle, in excess of $2.23 million. Other allegations include the fact that Yukon-Nevada and Marland, who (according to the third-party complaint) stated that he "controlled" Yukon-Nevada and Queenstake USA, concluded that Golden Eagle's contract was "too lucrative" and then tortiously interfered with the mill operating agreement between Golden Eagle and Queenstake USA by compelling Queenstake USA to breach its agreement and covenant of good faith and fair dealing with Golden Eagle on June 10, 2009. This breach, based on the counterclaim and third-party complaints, caused Golden Eagle to lose the "benefit of the bargain," or lost profit from the agreement, in excess of $40 million based on Queenstake USA's own calculations and representations to Golden Eagle and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP).
Golden Eagle Alleges Forcible Entry and Detainer on the Mill Property & Seeks Restitution
Golden Eagle also alleges that the mill operating agreement between the parties had all of the characteristics of a lease, putting Golden Eagle in possession of the mill property and its full use; ensuring Golden Eagle's quiet enjoyment of the premises; requiring Golden Eagle to maintain and repair the property; granting Golden Eagle access to the "common areas" on the mill complex, etc. As a result of these lease characteristics, Golden Eagle has counterclaimed against Queenstake USA for statutory relief under the Nevada Forcible Entry and Detainer statutes and seeks an order of the court based on those statutes putting Golden Eagle back in immediate possession of the mill property.
Golden Eagle Alleges Irreparable Harm and Seeks Equitable Remedies
Golden Eagle further alleges in its counterclaim and third-party complaints that Queenstake USA, Yukon-Nevada and Marland have caused it irreparable harm. As a result, Golden Eagle asks the court for a Declaratory Judgment and a Writ of Mandamus that order that Golden Eagle be allowed full possession of the mill property so that it may complete its contract term of 5 years.
Punitive Damages May Triple Any Compensatory Damage Judgment
Golden Eagle claims further that Queenstake USA, Yukon-Nevada and Marland have committed acts of oppression, fraud or malice, express or implied, and that Golden Eagle is entitled under Nevada law to recover punitive damages, which are calculated as up to three times the amount of compensatory damages.
Queenstake Canada's Unconditional Guarantee
Golden Eagle finally alleges that Queenstake Canada unconditionally guaranteed the terms of the agreement between Golden Eagle and Queenstake USA, and furthermore, unconditionally guaranteed the covenant of good faith and fair dealing between the parties. As a result, Queenstake Canada was also named as a third-party defendant in the suit sharing joint liability with its wholly owned subsidiary, Queenstake USA.
The Company recommends that you review its disclosures, risk statements, previous press releases, annual reports, quarterly reports and current reports found at its website: www.geii.com.