News Focus
News Focus
icon url

omegahpla

06/01/09 6:55 PM

#20934 RE: Craig Baker #20931

This stuff is normal. Some of the best gainers go through this and then take off. I don't think this is the same as all of those because they seem to be more volotile, but the same psychological influences apply. Of course, it dropped and people sell off. Traders usually pick the worse time to sell, it's a fact.

To bad the dilution ruined our flag pole formations coming to fruition. To bad forking Delaware department of consolidation of stuff is lazy and slow or something. To darn close to DC if you ask me, lol. To bad we have to wait for news we know is already in the works, I hate that.

Still a great company, still a great stock, still under valued.
icon url

Mojocash

06/01/09 8:41 PM

#20947 RE: Craig Baker #20931

Then they should ungag the TA right now if they are so pissed about it!
icon url

Mojocash

06/01/09 8:41 PM

#20948 RE: Craig Baker #20931

The selling must be from the accredited investor who they sold the shares to then ? .18 to .04 speaks volumes.
icon url

phrantic

06/01/09 9:55 PM

#20974 RE: Craig Baker #20931

That's good to hear CB, thanks. Sounds like their attorney is not real stock savvy if he's the one that told them to gag their TA. Just a thought, but if the attorney advised gagging the TA that's his bad. A gagged TA, especially in the Pinks, can cause exactly what we've been seeing. As I've said before, nothing else has changed with the company, so that's really the only reason I can pin it on that makes any sense. I am convinced there wasn't anything underhanded going on or we would have seen much higher volume than we've been seeing. JMO
icon url

roach4091

06/01/09 11:02 PM

#20977 RE: Craig Baker #20931

Soon as the A/S is reduced and any other pr's will drive us into the .20 range easily! IMO