barge,
it is my opinion that you are peddling diversion.
Again, for clarity ... I believe Janus has nothing to do with Wave. You feel otherwise.
That HIT or NEC or HP or anybody has ever "acknowledged the Wavemeter" it totally irrelevant or to use your word "specious".
Whether HP has or has not acknowledged the Wavemeter is not germane to whether the MSFT-Sony-Phillips-ITRU juggernaut has elected to license, employ, or plan for Wavemeter inclusion in the Janus monster. I believe they have not. You seem to think that the failed KidCard effort in Belgium has some bearing on this. Again, I do not think so and I believe the market and common sense echoes my sentiments and not yours. I believe the Shear and Palladium patents adequately describe the IP deployed in Janus and adequately provide for the client side use that you errantly call metering. You seem to disagree and point to the failed Zaptronix effort as your proof.
Confusing to me is why you repeatedly cite a failed effort by Wave to argue that Janus=Wavemeter.
I believe any astute reader can easily determine the comparative validity of our differing points of view.
Your rhetoric about me posting 27/7 is nothing but an inflammatory attack with no basis in reality. I post during a narrow time frame, I average around a post or two a day, and rarely eclipse 6 posts in any day.
Your Friend,
Dig Space.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
