David,
I am not bashing this stock or the company. I am stating the fact that without certified statements ESSO is just pink with promise, green products, and unconfirmed income and contracts. My stance is as someone who has more to invest, I would prefer more concrete proof that's all. I am not attacking the company or anyone on this board. I also don't think that the transparency of a company I have money in is a topic that " is so 5 minutes ago". Would you put you child in a school where the principal told you it was safe but you had yet to see any security? Prob not. Same with money and investing. Maybe im getting carried away and dont mean to. But i feel like I am being told to explain the my post because im not just hyping the company and writing extra positive one-liners about how EESO pps will be up to 5 dollars by next December or what was scribbled in the sand in a picture and how it represents some absurd amount of money.
Also, i am puzzled as to why a CEO with so much responsibility and duties within a firm goes on vacation in a middle of supposed buyout.
So what is your true stance Fieve?
In doing your research you know:
they announce audited finacials in Q3
That this company has grown and has had witnessed growth by people on this board. All-be-it growth in the PPS lol
That we have many, not few, but many patient Longs here and the numbers keep growing.
I'm still not getting your angle here. Your "positive posts" seem two sided. Now don't get me wrong your intentions may be good but as my daughter would say... It's so 5 minutes ago!
I guess what I'm trying to say is your posts, as far as a pinky life is concerned were dicussed thousands and thousands of posts ago. Obviously we welcome points of discussion. But please have clarity and relavency to the present discussion. Otherwise it sounds like, what I like to call "positive bashing".
Sincerely,
David
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
