News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Texan77

03/03/09 6:02 PM

#5412 RE: jimwalters #5411

if you question me then be direct dont be a wooos a miilion shares only cost 100 bucks but whatever you get ignore lol go question somebody elses integrity , i dont get it i was looking at historical and its not corect whatecver i traded this thing in triple zeros so ok i apologize historic doesnt match whatever i iguees i could pull y statement ya think i will ; could sworn i saw this at trip zeros
icon url

Texan77

03/03/09 6:23 PM

#5413 RE: jimwalters #5411

i apologize you are corect i am mistaken had 300 thousand been thinking trip zeros to long got my wires crosed anyway i sold almost all in aug thought i had owned 3mil im outa line and thanks for pointing it out
icon url

plaintif2000

03/04/09 2:58 AM

#5414 RE: jimwalters #5411

the problem w/ your theory jim, is that in the past AB has
been pretty good w/ follow through. If AB and the rest of
the insiders are not selling then the share price will become
buying-sensitive. There is no denying the scenario IF they
are true to their word.

I think the bottom buying cleaned up all the loose shares
the queston is when will longs throw in the towel and make
back some of the money that the lost? I would say the past
dilution put investors in "dont give a crap" mode, hence
many such will not sell since they've already written every
thing off. Others will hold for a possible huge move. i'd
say the dynamics of the past favor the odds that more will
hold than sell. If that is correct this will continue to
move upward.