So, correct me if I'm wrong, your response is that although irrefutable evidence exists and supports your position, you are going to withhold it from the investors?
Is that right?
Understand, of course, that such a position is not helpful to the promotion of the company but is in fact detrimental.
Just as the gagging of the TA sends an ominous signal to investors who think that such information is essential to making good investment decisions, the withholding of pertinent information provides the perception, however inadvertent, of hiding something.
Explain the fraud that the pumpers were putting out that RCCH had $80,000,000 in assets. They have had zero revenues for the past couple of years. The notion that RCCH is going to spin off "multiple" subsidiaries is ridiculous and is not supported by any filings or other DD. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35611740
They are trying to peddle IWS in a merger but what shell would want a company that has no revenues? I predict months will go by with NO NEWS from Gene on the merger. RCCH will stay on the pinks just as I predicted because no one else will have them.
Without revenues what is the point of being in business? The government approvals mean nothing if no one is paying for their product. Even a taco stand could produce rev's but not IWS. Explain that to me.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
