News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Al E Gater

07/11/04 1:40 PM

#49522 RE: chisox pat #49521

awwwwwwwwwwww.........But the charge was that if CMKX acted as their own TA, that they would cook the books. Please catch up. And what was vague about the PR?
icon url

Tate202

07/11/04 1:54 PM

#49527 RE: chisox pat #49521

chisox..That isn't nice to say. You hope everyone is acting in good faith. I would prefer the company did not act as their own TA, but for different reasons. My concerns are the enormous amount of paper work involved to become fully reporting and then stay current. It is a full time job as I see it.
There is a more serious conflict of interest if a broker dealer acts as the TA, IMO. I would prefer the company took over or a legitimate transfer agent company.
icon url

The_Free_Nebula

07/11/04 1:54 PM

#49528 RE: chisox pat #49521

It is also why folks should not get overly serious about this play...It could end any day at any time without warning.