News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Investorman

02/09/09 1:45 PM

#454 RE: MrBankRoll #453

Consumers Identify Safe, Modern and Sustainable U.S. Manufacturing As Priorities
Monday February 9, 9:18 am ET

Survey Shows Most Americans Believe Highly Automated Factories Important to Economic Growth; Majority Support a Stimulus Package to Modernize U.S. Factories


WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--An overwhelming majority of Americans believe that safer, cleaner and more energy-efficient production are the most important manufacturing issues in today’s economy according to a recent survey by Opinion Research Corporation. Most Americans also believe that highly automated, modern factories are important to improve and grow the U.S. economy and that a federal government stimulus package should support an increase in the number of modern, automated factories.

“Whether it’s toys, peanut butter or pet food, product quality is top of mind for Americans,” said Rockwell Automation Chairman & CEO Keith Nosbusch. “Consumers recognize that government incentives to invest in more highly automated, modern factories can both stimulate U.S. economic growth and lead to safer, cleaner and more energy-efficient production at the same time.”

“Modern information-enabled plant floors can track and trace materials that come in and products that go out, to help ensure consumers get safe, quality products. American priorities are clear, and we believe that elected officials at all levels of government will find this data compelling as they make sure legislative priorities are in line with public priorities,” said Nosbusch.

When considering a manufacturing company, Americans chose product and employee safety, and environmental issues as the most important attributes. Among the top answers chosen include:


Provide safe, quality products (86%)
Provide a safe workplace (84%)
Use natural resources efficiently (80%)
Produce minimal waste (71%)
Keep current prices or reduce prices (59%)
Why Americans Believe Government Incentives for Manufacturing are Needed

Despite the economic downturn, support remains strong and unchanged from a similar survey last summer for government incentives to U.S. companies to invest in technology and automation to remain competitive and keep manufacturing operations from moving overseas. More than three-quarters (79%) said the government should provide such incentives. Americans believe U.S. manufacturers need to invest in automating and modernizing their factories to improve environmental sustainability, competitive position and product quality.


Use energy, raw materials or natural resources more efficiently (92%)
Continue to remain competitive and grow (89%)
Minimize waste and other environmental impacts (86%)
Provide safer, high quality products (85%)
Respond more quickly to customer demands (85%)
Provide a safer workplace (83%)
“These results show that the public expects manufacturers to improve their competitiveness,” Nosbusch said. “However, it also recognizes the public’s belief that manufacturers should be encouraged to adopt sustainable production practices that will use energy more efficiently, minimize environmental impacts, increase product safety and provide safer workplaces,” he added.

When determining their support for a federal stimulus package that improves U.S. manufacturing operations, Americans noted product issues as their most important consideration.


Provide safe, quality products that are always available when I need them (89%)
Keep product prices at current or reduced level (85%)
Maintain the current number and types of jobs available (85%)
Automate and modernize factories (74%)
Provide higher-paid, high-skilled jobs (62%)
U.S. Manufacturing’s Competitive Edge

Nearly half of Americans (42%) surveyed believe the U.S. has lost its competitive edge in manufacturing technology and automation, and think the manufacturing sector in this country has gotten less competitive in the last ten years. Only 18 percent believe U.S. manufacturing technology is more advanced than other countries and only about a third (34%) noted the U.S. has become more competitive in the past ten years.

“While most Americans think incorrectly that the U.S. is no longer the world’s largest manufacturer, they feel there is an urgent need for government stimulus,” Nosbusch said. “Government incentives to modernize manufacturing will help create highly-skilled, higher-paying jobs upgrading and operating more automated U.S. factories for many years to come. The technologies are cost-effective and ready to be deployed today for benefits that are both immediate and sustainable.”

The findings are based on surveys conducted by The Opinion Research Corporation during January 15-18, 2009 and May 2008. The surveys, sponsored by Rockwell Automation, are designed to determine public attitudes on manufacturing technology and automation in order to understand priorities for industry and for U.S. government policy planning. Results of each survey are based on telephone interviews conducted among representative samples of 1,001 adults, age 18 and over, living in private households, in the continental United States. All completed interviews were weighted by four variables: age, gender, race and region to ensure reliable and accurate representation of the adult population. The margin of error at a 95% confidence level is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the total sample. Smaller sub-groups will have larger error margins.

Link to survey: “Public Attitudes on Manufacturing Technology and Automation” by Rockwell Automation

http://www.rockwellautomation.com/news/get/ManufacturingSurvey.pdf
icon url

Investorman

02/10/09 9:19 PM

#455 RE: MrBankRoll #453

Rockwell Automation to Acquire Rutter Hinz, a Leading Engineering Company
Tuesday February 10, 5:00 pm ET

Acquisition will accelerate company growth and expand reach in Canadian oil and gas and heavy industries market


MILWAUKEE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK - News) today announced it has agreed to purchase the majority of the assets of Rutter Hinz Inc., a leading engineering company. Rutter Hinz is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rutter Inc., a publicly held Canadian company. Headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada, Rutter Hinz’s annual sales are approximately $35 million (U.S.). Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
Rutter Hinz has engineering expertise in industrial automation, process control and power distribution, specifically for the oil and gas industry, in addition to the pipeline, utility, mining, forestry and food and beverage sectors. The company’s management team and approximately 220 employees will join Rockwell Automation’s Systems & Solutions business unit.

“This acquisition accelerates the growth of Rockwell Automation’s business and reach in Canada’s heavy industries and oil and gas market, enhances our Canadian oil sands opportunities, and establishes a robust delivery capability in a major market with critical expertise,” said Terry Gebert, vice president and general manager, Rockwell Automation Systems & Solutions.

“Rutter Hinz customers will continue to receive the high level of service they currently enjoy,” said Ryan Hinz, Rutter Inc. president and CEO.

“This acquisition continues to strengthen our global project management and engineering solutions delivery capability – as we have done with ProsCon and ICS Triplex acquisitions in Europe, CIE in Latin America, and Xi'An Hengsheng in China,” Gebert added. “Customers will now benefit from the expanded portfolio of application solutions, expertise and delivery capacity that Rutter Hinz offers, particularly to the oil and gas market.”

The acquisition includes Rutter Hinz’s engineering and automation businesses in Canada and the United States, but not its Newfoundland consulting engineering business or the assets of Rutter Technologies Inc. These operations will continue as part of Rutter Inc.

Rutter Hinz has eight offices in Canada and two in the U.S.

The acquisition is expected to close during the current quarter.

icon url

Investorman

03/12/09 2:31 PM

#456 RE: MrBankRoll #453

Seeking Alpha
Bright Future for U.S. Industry as We Move from Consumer to Industrial Economy

The New York Times’ “Conflicting Signals About the Chinese Economy” reports that Chinese exports fell 25.7% last month, yet China is still trying to stimulate its industrial economy. At the same time, Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke is about to embark on a $1T program to expand consumer credit. American consumers are balking at both, while defiantly increasing their savings rate to a near term record 5%.

The coordinated world economic plan appears to be focused at the American consumer pulling all nations out of a near depression. But fundamental changes will prevent this from happening. First, as reported by The Wall Street Journal’s “Lean Factories Find It Hard to Cut Jobs Even in a Slump”, American factories are running so efficiently that foreign low cost labor is becoming far less relevant than factories being close to their customers.

Second, the cost of transportation and long lead times often outweigh labor savings. Third, consumer deleveraging is leading to less predictable consumer spending patterns. Factories will need to prepare for small runs, higher levels of customizations and unpredictable reorder patterns.

The long production cycle, just-in-time manufacturing model exemplified by Toyota (TM) is now dead. China just does not realize this yet. Local highly flexible manufacturing will replace the lethargic dinosaur logistics and sourcing that signifies the Chinese-Wal-Mart (WMT) model of today. How much longer can Macy’s (M) order 9 months in advance for Christmas?

What’s even more disturbing is that the Fed is depending on a narrow slice of consumers to restart our historic consumer economy. Just like I wrote in "Fed Pushes Housing into Stronger Hands", the Fed is now trying to push consumer credit into the strongest hands. The TALF program is seeking triple-A rated securitizations targeted at consumers with FICO scores exceeding 660. These are the more responsible consumers that are deleveraging now and strengthening their balance sheets. Making auto loans available to these consumers is like “pushing on a string.”

The whole focus of pushing money into strong hands to stimulate the economy is flawed. Alternatively, promoting investment into long-term flexible manufacturing assets might not stimulate the economy as fast. But, at least we will begin the difficult transition back to an industrial based economy. The service based economic model of the last few decades was merely a charade for foreign financed drunken consumer indulgence.

America’s future is extremely bright for industrial process and control manufacturers such as Eaton (ETN), Ingersoll-Rand (IR), Parker Hannifin (PH) and Rockwell Automation (ROK).



icon url

Investorman

04/08/09 12:48 PM

#457 RE: MrBankRoll #453

Rockwell Automation Declares Quarterly Dividend on Common Stock

Wednesday April 8, 2009, 12:40 pm EDT
MILWAUKEE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK - News) board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of 29 cents per share on its common stock, payable on June 10, 2009 to shareowners of record at the close of business on May 18, 2009.


Dividend remains unchanged.

icon url

Investorman

04/17/09 11:40 AM

#458 RE: MrBankRoll #453

Intro To Index Funds
Zack O'Malley Greenburg, 04.16.09, 6:00 PM ET


Crash. Disaster. Meltdown. These are some of the words used to describe the stock market lately.

Forget all that. Despite the recent pain, stocks have gained 8.7% per year on average over the past 80 years. If that's not enough to convince you, consider what a great deal stocks are these days compared to a year an a half ago, when they were trading for nearly double the price.

For most investors, the best way to own stocks is via an index funds. These are mutual funds that give you broad stock market exposure for a rock-bottom cost and with superlative tax efficiency. The alternative: actively managed funds, which charge several times more and run up hefty tax bills in a usually vain bid to beat the market.

Index and actively managed mutual funds can both be purchased directly from a vendor like Vanguard, Fidelity Investments or T. Rowe Price. Many brokerage accounts also make them available, but beware of sales loads, or commissions, if you buy this way. If your employer offers a 401(k) retirement account, it probably offers index funds as a way to get exposure to hundreds of individual stocks with a single purchase.

What distinguishes index funds is that they don't presume to have greater wisdom than the collective market but instead try to channel its wisdom to your advantage. The most widely owned index in the U.S. is the Standard & Poor's 500, which includes 500 of the nation's largest public companies.

In contrast, actively managed funds are run by money managers who aim to beat the market by buying and selling individual stocks based on their own criteria. With thousands of managers plying this trade, some invariably beat the market each year. Those are the ones who tend to get lauded as geniuses by a gushing financial media. Most fail dismally and with little fanfare.

Picking the relative handful of managers who will beat the market in advance is a sucker's bet that preys on investors' inherent optimism and over-confidence in their abilities. The only consistent winners at this game are the fund firms that rake off billions of dollars in fees.

"We prefer index funds to actively managed funds," says Mary A. Malgoire, president of The Family Firm, a financial advisory in Bethesda, Md. "At least the indexes save you the management fees. Otherwise, it's like running a marathon in cement shoes. The fees just drag you down."

Rare is the fund manager who can consistently beat the market--and those are getting rarer. According to a 2006 study by economists Laurent Barras and Russell Wermers of the University of Maryland and Olivier Scaillet of the University of Geneva in Switzerland, just 14% of active managers beat the market by a statistically significant margin in 1990. By 2006 the figure had plunged to 0.6% after fees, thanks to the rising fees charged by mutual funds.

Management fees for actively managed equity mutual funds run around 1.5% on average--on a straight-line basis, not the lower asset-weighted one the industry likes to tout. That's 15 times the 0.1% you'll pay to track a market index via a low-cost mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The 1.4 percentage point difference may not seem like a lot, but it adds up over time. Let's say you invest $5,000 in a mutual fund that charges a 1.5% annual fee. In 20 years, assuming an average growth rate of 8%, your $5,000 will have grown to $17,225. Sounds great, but not compared to the $22,843 you'd have had if you'd invested the same amount of money in Fidelity's Spartan 500 index fund, whose fee is 0.1% for a minimum investment of $10,000 in a regular account or $500 in some retirement accounts.

Look at it another way: Over the course of 20 years, owning that expensive mutual fund means paying $3,100--more than half of your initial investment--in fees. That's not even counting the additional money you'd have made if you'd reinvested that $3,100 instead of handing it over to the fund's managers.

By contrast, that inexpensive index fund would cost you just $244 in fees over the same time period. (The SEC offers a cost calculator if you'd like to run the numbers yourself.)

The same rules apply when choosing between various index funds. Shop for the cheapest one that fits your needs. Vanguard offers some of the most reasonable index funds. The Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) and the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFINX) each offer broad U.S. stock exposure for 0.15% a year and require minimum initial investments of $3,000.

For international exposure, the Vanguard Total International Stock Index (VGTSX) or iShares' MSCI EAFE Index Fund (EFA) each charge 0.34% fees.

Once you've formed the core of your portfolio with index funds, if you can't resist the temptation to try and knock out the lights, consider an actively managed mutual fund with a solid long-term record and the same manager in place who posted the alluring numbers. For a list of prospects, see the Forbes Honor Roll.

"Do your gambling in Vegas," says Malgoire. "Just get your money in the market, don't try to be brilliant."