News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mas

11/13/08 11:07 AM

#71078 RE: Saturn V #71075

The deal will most likely get renegotiated

Pipedream.
icon url

Sarmad

11/13/08 12:04 PM

#71081 RE: Saturn V #71075

>> There must have been a large number of order cancellations, since the new guidance is significantly lower than the old minimum. Means that there will be significant inventory accumulation.
<<

re inventory. Intel's customers reduced their demand by $1.2B. With 55% margin, that means Intel's inventory should increase by $550m. However that would be finished parts. If they hold the parts as wafers, and slow down test and packaging, maybe the excess work-in-process will be only $400m or less.

Further, since Intel tries to exit q4 with reduced inventory (from q3), possibly the inventory bump will be even lower. Like $200m. Also, from Intel's comment, it is likely that distributor inventories will be very lean. So the larger inventory held by Intel will just compensate for low inventories with computer makers.

Does this seem reasonable, or is something missed here ?
icon url

smooth2o

11/13/08 12:12 PM

#71084 RE: Saturn V #71075

Saturn: This becomes a "turns business" environment. Customers do not place orders weeks or months ahead, since they can buy immediately. This typically leads to even worse visibility into the business.

Well, that's what Intel said in the CC. They are now managing inventory tighter. I'm not sure you can shut down one fab our of four and keep the other 3 at full cap, but maybe that's what they have to do.

Smooth
icon url

Golfbum

11/13/08 2:45 PM

#71108 RE: Saturn V #71075

spelling nit:

Otellini not "Otilleni"

gb