I believe the 'holy grail' will continue to evolve. It is not a stationary
target to achieve as there can always be improvements made.
Being first to make a workable product is then worth nothing? Would it still be worth nothing if there is no other competitor that comes up with anything comparable in the next 10 years? Will EFFC continue to evolve and refine during this time?
We've been down this path before and I acknowledged my possible
errors. Anyone can make a physical shell of a product. There are
companies that specialize in the creation of prototype enclosures.
Suffice it to say we differ on the status at the time the 'prototype'
was displayed publicly.
If prototypes were so easily made then why automatically always assume the worst case scenario?
Correct me if I am wrong, but the 'product' is not on the market yet.
What is being passed around is still in the development stage and not
a mass produced (or limited production run) product and it has been
installed for field testing in very few places.
Well, we will just have to see no? We had an interesting LOI with target date of end of this year for possible completion of a huge contract with a large company. What will you say then? Let me guess. How about that CRAM is still in developmental stage and products continue to evolve and we will never know who will come next, that Obama may suspend all auto manufacturing, that sun will stop burning and life will end as we know it. Then I might consider getting out of EFFC.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
