Well that I certainly can understand. But if I might get your opinion.....
On a certain IRPs disclaimer, he lists a company that apparently he just took on today. He is now posting on that board, without any disclaimer in his posts. Prior to taking them on to promo their stock, he never posted on that board at all.
Didn't it start out that the default was that ALL posts by IRPs had the disclaimer in each post & if you didn't want to post it, you checked (or unchecked) the box or something along those lines? Then it was changed that if you wanted the disclaimer in a post, you ticked the box...perhaps we should go back to the way it was previously in that all posts contained the disclaimer thingy unless you opted out.
personally, if you are paid to promote a stock and on that board, everything should be marked....then there is no need for guys like me to raise doubts about honesty/integrity/sincerity/motive....