Which 25m shares are you talking about, the ones that were created to bring things into balance if someone decided to convert their shares, or the ones that they were "paid" to provide coverage?
Also, one would assume a minimum contract length for this type of "reporting", and yes, it is highly biased. I personally have issues with any company that "pays" for "coverage". It's a huge waste of money, and most of them are paid in shares (look at any "glossy" you recieve or pump email..read the fine print). Actually, I have one here in my "saved" items where someone paid $150,000 in shares for this kind of P&D.
There are better ways to promote a company, such as letting it speak for itself.
You assume I have some inside information, which I don't. It's purely common sense, which is not so common anymore, 'specially here.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
