More BS....
chipot at it again with ulterior motives.
what company did you say you worked for chipped?
you state...
"They did a few things right in 2002. Confused, but good."
Not as I see it and IMO
management knew exactly what they are doing.
how else would you explain ALL the shares they served them selves. and not updating the shareholders about anything?
real problem again IMO. is they have always treated this company as private. It looks great on paper that they
haven't diluted the stock...however if they would have taken a lil less of it and given some to the real consultants and advisers we the shareholders would not be seeing pink.
also again our resident basher keeps stating over and over how "the cost of 6 cents per cubic foot is too high, tell that too folks in industry that have no power available to them in remote sections of the world or even underwater like say submarines. I must again bring notice to the fact that they have a sell-able by product that reduces the cost.
WHY DO YOU KEEP LEAVING THAT PART OUT chipot?
finally and once again I ask you, do you have patents on
any alternative energy devices?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
