Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
greetings easyrider....you know , you are right , i had not...yes they are still a startup , but with huge potential....if/when they get a good funding package , things could turn around quick....not trying to pump argy and was kidding about 'to da moon'....lol....anyway it is nice to meet you...lol...i thought this was the argy board...whoooops
It seems (EXGN) EXIM Internet Group, Inc. is totally new company and in my opinion it belongs more likely to the e-business/internet sector rather than Oil/Gas/Natural Energy Production …
An update to the board could be a quick look up over Google: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-25,GGLG:en&q...
Also, it seems they put up a new web site where one can learn a bit more about the new company….
http://eximinternet.com
I am not sure why they did not properly announce their change in the principal business activity as well as of their management…
I recently converted my HYVR stock into EXGN…
Does anyone know about any existing connection between the old and new company, any of the old board directors, executives, etc, etc?? I think someone has bought out the old company – again nothing announced…
Thanks to all
Peter
And 4mr4 was right. It was drain cleaner, Aluminum and Lye. Excellent work on his part.
Hydrogenerate founder extradited from Thailand:
William Lamar Woslum was arrested in Thailand for using a false passport and sent to San Diego where he faces trial for the 1993 molestation of a 6 year old girl. He has a previous conviction for a similar offense in Ventura County.
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/06/24/news/sandiego/19_59_326_23_05.txt
Entry into Material Agreement, Change in Control, Change in Dir
Form 8-K for HYDRO ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES INC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6-Jul-2005
Entry into Material Agreement, Change in Control, Change in Dir
ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
On July 5, 2006, Exim Internet Group, Inc., received notification that Exim Holdings, SA, a Panama corporation, ratified the license agreement for the Corporation to operate an Internet trade portal on a worldwide basis. The license agreement provides that Exim Internet Group, Inc., has the worldwide license to operate the USA Export Import new generation Vertical Portal focused primarily on export-import business and the international trading, representing a large scale several hundred thousand pages Export Import Industry b2b Portal, Directory, Trade boards and more while featuring industry-specific information, solutions, resources, services, trade leads, forums, tools, tariffs, duties, taxes, and more products and the tradenames and/or trademarks associated with the USA Export Import portal. This license agreement provides that a 2% royalty be paid to the licensor, Exim Holdings, SA. The license agreement was negotiated and agreed to in May 2005, however the agreement provided that both the licensor and the licensee had to have both corporation's board of directors ratify the license agreement. Such ratification was obtained by the licensor on July 5, 2005.
ITEM 5.01 CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT5
On June 23, 2005, Oleg Lazarov was appointed President, CEO and sole Officer of the Corporation, replacing Mr. McKeen Worthen who was appointed in December 2004 and interim Secretary and Director, Nicholas Alexander, who was appointed on an interim basis on June 1, 2005 and resigned on June 23, 2005 for the purposes of securing new auditors. Mr. Oleg Lazarov was issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock of the Corporation pursuant to the ratifying of the license agreement with Exim Holdings, SA. Exim Holdings, SA was issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the ratifying of the license agreement. As of this date, there are 21,362,545 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Mr. Oleg Lazarov's shares are 5.6% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding shares and the Exim Holdings, SA's shares are 37.45% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding shares of common stock. There are no preferred shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
ITEM 5.02 DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR PRINCIPAL OFFICERS
Mark Schmulesky's resignation as president and director was effective December 30, 2004.
McKeen Worthen's resignation as president and director since December 30, 2004 was accepted, effective June 23, 2005.
Nicholas Alexander's resignation as interim secretary and director since June 2005 was accepted, effective June 23, 2005.
ITEM 5.03 AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation's name was changed from Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc., to Global Trade Portal Corporation on January 5, 2005 and then changed its name to Exim Internet Group, Inc., on April 29, 2005.
July 5, 2005 EXIM INTERNET GROUP, INC.
By /s/ Oleg Lazarov
Mr. Oleg Lazarov, President and Director
So what is EXMG anyway?
Does anyone hear from Worthen?
Anyone reconsidered the idea that burning Aluminum in water to extract Hydrogen is a sound way of getting fuel to a car, water heater, or whatever?
GTPC now EXMG...
05/23/2005 GTPC Global Trade Portal Corporation Common
Stock
EXMG: EXIM Internet Group, Inc. Common Stock **
Is there any word from Worthen?
Is he a believer in the future powered by Aluminum or is he just taking over the ticker to use for some other operation?
Ouch, don't mention HYVR. Thats a bad word...
What's the new company all about?
Is there any relationship to HYVR or intention to market the "invention"? Who are these people?
Looks to be a 1000/1 RS...
New symbol for HYVR...
GTPC
Global Trade Portal Corporation
chipotle_pickle been sleeping on the job again
Response to the patent app:
I'm interested in the response to the patent app. Reading it, I see a machine for converting dollars to dimes. The chemistry is spelled out, and it's easy to see that it's mostly waste heat produced, and that the "by-product" is not rare or expensive. But what do the investors see?
My theory is that investor reaction to the patent application would have been negative, and that, HYVR, anticipating this, pulled its patent applications to keep them from the investors. Reading the patent now, can anyone think of any better reason than this to pull all the patent apps from before 2003-04, that the invention is old hat?
Here's the app;
( 1 of 1 )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Patent Application 20040205997
Kind Code A1
Youngblood, David October 21, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portable heat and gaseous fuel generator that does not require electrical power input or electrical control
Abstract
A dual-chamber, aqueous-chemistry-based portable reactor for reducing water via any of numerous possible exothermic reactions to produce both heat and hydrogen gas. In one embodiment, aluminum metal is contained within a lower reaction chamber, an aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution is contained in an upper chamber, and the aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution is fed by gravity into the lower reaction chamber to vigorously react with the aluminum metal to produce both heat and hydrogen gas. A static feedback-control tube returns the aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution back from the second chamber to the first chamber in the event that excessive hydrogen-gas pressure builds up in the second chamber, providing feedback-control of the rate of the reduction of water in the second chamber by a combination of gas pressure and hydrostatic pressure. A heat exchanger within the second chamber removes heat from the second chamber in the form of heated water or other heated liquids or gasses, and by increasing the rate of heat removal, the rate of reduction of water to hydrogen can be decreased, providing a second feedback control. In a second embodiment, a single-chambered reaction vessel is employed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors: Youngblood, David; (Battle Ground, WA)
Correspondence Name and Address: OLYMPIC PATENT WORKS PLLC
P.O. BOX 4277
SEATTLE
WA
98104
US
Serial No.: 417297
Series Code: 10
Filed: April 15, 2003
U.S. Current Class: 48/197R; 48/127.9; 48/61; 48/62R; 48/89; 48/94
U.S. Class at Publication: 048/197.00R; 048/061; 048/062.00R; 048/089; 048/094; 048/127.9
Intern'l Class: C10J 001/00; B01J 003/00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. A heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator comprising: a first chamber containing water; a second chamber containing a reductant substance, into which water from the first chamber is introduced in order to be reduced, by an exothermic redox reaction, to produce hydrogen gas; and a static control tube interconnecting the first chamber with the second chamber to provide feedback control for controlling the reduction reaction, with increasing hydrogen pressure in the second chamber forcing water from the second chamber back into the first chamber, thereby decreasing the rate of, or stopping altogether, the redox reaction.
2. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: an automatic pressure relief valve to release pressure from the first chamber.
3. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: an automatic pressure relief valve to release pressure from the second chamber.
4. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a temperature indicator that displays an indication of the temperature in the first chamber.
5. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a temperature indicator that displays an indication of the temperature in the second chamber.
6. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a formula-feed control valve and formula-feed tube that allows water to be introduced from the first chamber into the second chamber.
7. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a fluid-level indicator including a transparent tube that displays the fluid level in the second chamber.
8. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a by-product-recovery-and-reactor drain and by-product-recovery-and-reactor valve that allow for reaction byproduct to be removed from the second chamber.
9. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 further including: a heat-exchange-tube coil that surrounds a reductant vessel within the second chamber to allow heat produced by the exothermic redox reaction to be passed into a coolant fluid circulating within the heat-exchange-tube coil and within an interconnected, external heat-consuming device or component, the heat-exchange-tube coil interconnected with the external heat-consuming device or component by tubing that passes through walls of the second chamber by passing through an input and an output port.
10. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 wherein the reductant is metallic aluminum and the first chamber contains an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide.
11. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 10 further including a metallic platinum catalyst within the second chamber that facilitates the reduction of water.
12. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 1 wherein the reductant is metallic magnesium.
13. A method for producing heat and gaseous fuel, the method comprising: introducing an aqueous sodium-hydroxide solution into a first chamber of a heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator; introducing metallic aluminum into a second chamber of a heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator; opening a formula-feed control valve to allow aqueous sodium-hydroxide solution to flow from the first chamber to the second chamber to initiate the reduction of water by aluminum to produce hydrogen gas and heat; and opening a static control tube interconnecting the first chamber with the second chamber to provide feedback control that controls reduction of water by the metallic aluminum.
14. The method of claim 13 further including introducing a metallic platinum catalyst into the second chamber.
15. The method of claim 14 further including: periodically removing the by-product aluminum hydroxide slurry from the second chamber; and filtering and drying the slurry to prepare aluminum hydroxide as a third product of the method.
16. The method of claim 13 further including passing a cooling gas or liquid through a heat exchanger within the second chamber to recover heat from the second chamber to remove heat generated by reduction of water by the aluminum metal within the second chamber, a rate of cooling acting as a second control that controls reduction of water by the metallic aluminum.
17. The method of claim 16 further including passing heated coolant through a heat consuming device in order to recover heat generated by reduction of water by the aluminum metal within the second chamber.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the heat consuming device may be selected from among: a water heater; a residential heater; an electric generator; an oven; a kiln; and a furnace.
19. A heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator comprising: a chamber containing a reductant substance, into which aqueous sodium-hydroxide solution is introduced in order to be reduced, by an exothermic redox reaction, to produce hydrogen gas and heat; and a heat-exchange-tube coil within the chamber to allow the heat produced by the exothermic redox reaction to be passed into a coolant fluid circulating within the heat-exchange-tube coil and within an interconnected, external heat-consuming device or component, the heat-exchange-tube coil interconnected with the external heat-consuming device or component by tubing that passes through walls of the second chamber by passing through an input and an output port, the reduction of water controlled by a rate at which coolant fluid is passed through the heat exchanger.
20. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including: an automatic pressure relief valve to release pressure from the chamber.
21. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including: a temperature indicator that displays an indication of the temperature in the chamber.
22. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including: a fluid-level indicator including a transparent tube that displays the fluid level in the chamber.
23. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including: a by-product-recovery-and-reactor drain and by-product-recovery-and-reactor valve that allow for reaction byproduct to be removed from the chamber.
24. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including a metallic platinum catalyst within the second chamber that facilitates the reduction of water.
25. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 19 further including a reductant vessel within the chamber in which the aluminum metal is contained;
26. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 25 wherein the reductant vessel further includes: an inner cylinder, with a closed bottom and slot-like apertures, containing aluminum metal; and an outer cylinder, with a closed top and slot-like apertures complementary to the slot-like apertures of the inner cylinder, in which the inner cylinder is rotatably mounted so that, when the inner cylinder is rotated with respect to the outer cylinder, the slot-like apertures of the inner cylinder are aligned with the slot-like apertures of the outer cylinder to allow aqueous sodium-hydroxide solution to enter the inner cylinder and react with aluminum metal within the inner cylinder.
27. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator of claim 26 further including: a shaft passing through the outer cylinder to which the inner cylinder is mounted; a threaded nut and O-ring seal that rotatably mounts the shaft and fixedly mounts the outer cylinder to a top wall of the chamber so that the chamber remains sealed; and a handle mounted to the shaft, external to the chamber, allowing the shaft and inner cylinder to be rotated with respect to the outer cylinder.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to heat-and-gaseous-fuel generators and, in particular, to a portable heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator that employs a reducing agent that reduces water via an exothermic reaction to produce both heat and gaseous hydrogen.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] For many years prior to 1973, fossil-fuel energy sources were cheap and widely available for powering automobiles and other vehicles, portable generators, and various motor-driven mechanical devices, as well as for generating heat to heat buildings, residences, water, and for other heating applications. However, after the initial energy crisis of 1973, and continuing increasing cost and questions of availability of fossil fuels, much research has been devoted to finding and exploiting alternative energy sources for these applications. Much research has been conducted on solar-power generation, alternative biomass fuels, nuclear energy, and hydrogen fuel cells. While many of these technologies have matured to the point of usefulness in specific applications, there are still relatively few energy sources and heat and power generation devices, other than traditional fossil-fuel-based generators, that are commercially feasible for portable and remote applications, and for personal, residential, and small-business applications. Thus, a need has continued to be recognized for commercially feasible, environmentally safe, and otherwise non-hazardous heat and power sources for remote applications and for residential, individual, and small-business applications.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] One embodiment of the present invention employs a dual-chamber, aqueous-chemistry-based portable reactor for reducing water via any of numerous possible exothermic reactions to produce both heat and hydrogen gas. As one example, aluminum metal is contained within a lower reaction chamber. An aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution is contained in an upper chamber. The aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution is fed by gravity into the lower reaction chamber to vigorously react with the aluminum metal to produce both heat and hydrogen gas. A static feedback-control tube returns the aqueous, sodium-hydroxide solution back from the second chamber to the first chamber in the event that excessive hydrogen-gas pressure builds up in the second chamber. Thus, the rate of the reduction of water in the second chamber is feedback-controlled by a combination of gas pressure and hydrostatic pressure. A heat exchanger within the second chamber removes heat from the second chamber in the form of heated water or other heated liquids or gasses. By increasing the flow of water or other liquids or gasses through the heat exchanger, the rate of heat removal can be controlled. Increasing the rate of heat removal decreases the rate of reduction of water to hydrogen, and thus can also be used to control the rate of heat and hydrogen production in hydrogen-gas generation.
[0004] In a second embodiment, a single-chambered reaction vessel is employed. A reductant is loaded into a reductant vessel within the reaction vessel and exposed to an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Water is reduced to hydrogen gas, and heat is produced. In the second embodiment, the rate of water reduction and concomitant heat production and hydrogen-gas generation is controlled exclusively by controlling the flow of water or other liquids or gasses through the heat exchange component within the single reaction chamber.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0005] FIG. 1 shows a front view of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator.
[0006] FIG. 2 shows the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator displayed in FIG. 1 rotated 90 degrees to the right, in a semi-cutaway view.
[0007] FIG. 3 shows the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator displayed in FIG. 1 rotated 90 degrees to the left, in a semi-cutaway view.
[0008] FIG. 4 shows a top-down view of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator shown in FIG. 1.
[0009] FIG. 5 shows a reductant vessel employed in a second embodiment of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator.
[0010] FIGS. 6A-J illustrate feedback control of the water-reduction reaction that proceeds within the lower chamber of one embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0011] One embodiment of the present invention is a portable heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator. FIG. 1 shows a front view of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator. Note that FIGS. 1-4 show various views of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator, but that all features are not shown in each view in order to simplify the figures for clarity.
[0012] The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator 100 comprises two chambers 102 and 104. The upper chamber 102 is loaded with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, in one embodiment. The lower chamber 104 is the reaction chamber that, in one embodiment, is loaded with metallic aluminum. Both the upper chamber 102 and the lower chamber 104 are vented to the environment through separate pressure relief values 106 and 108, respectively. There is an upper-chamber manual relief value and tube 110 for releasing pressurized liquid and gas from the upper chamber. The upper chamber 102 and lower chamber 104 are interconnected by a formula-feed tube 112 controlled by a formula-feed control valve 114. Both the upper chamber 102 and the lower chamber 104 include visual pressure indicators 116 and 118, respectively, and temperature indicators 120 and 122, respectively. The formula-feed valve 114 is opened in order to introduce the aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, in one embodiment, from the upper chamber 102 into the lower chamber 104 in order to initiate the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generating reaction. Thus, the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator 100 provides visual indicators, automatic pressure relief valves, and manually operated formula-feed-control and relief valves to allow for full external monitoring and control of the water-reduction reaction that occurs in the lower chamber 104.
[0013] FIG. 2 shows the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator displayed in FIG. 1 rotated 90 degrees to the right, in a semi-cutaway view. As noted above, certain components displayed in FIG. 1 are not displayed in FIG. 2, to simplify FIG. 2. For example, the formula-feed tube and control valve (112 and 114 in FIG. 1), if shown in FIG. 2, would be centrally disposed on the surface of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator. In order to eliminate visual cluttering of the illustrations, FIG. 2 is shown as a partial cutaway view of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator.
[0014] Several additional features are shown in FIG. 2. The first additional feature is a fluid-level indicator 202 that includes a transparent tubing section 204 for display of the level of aqueous solution within the lower chamber 104. A second additional feature displayed in FIG. 2 is a static control tube 206 and static control valve 208. The static control tube 206 provides a feedback loop so that, if the pressure of hydrogen gas begins to build within the lower chamber 104, aqueous solution is displaced by the pressurized gas through the static control tube 206 back into the upper chamber 102. Removal of aqueous solution from the lower chamber quenches the water-reducing reaction, inhibiting further increase in hydrogen pressure. Thus, the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator incorporates feedback control for preventing hazardous pressure buildup within the reaction chamber. A third additional feature shown in FIG. 2 is a hydrogen-gas outlet 210 through which hydrogen gas may be expelled from the reaction chamber. The hydrogen-gas outlet 210 may be controlled by a flow-control valve incorporated into the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator 100, or may be flow controlled further downstream, at the entry point to a hydrogen-gas combustion device or other hydrogen-gas consuming component. A fourth additional feature displayed in FIG. 2 is a heat-exchange-tube coil 212 that surrounds a stainless-steel reactant vessel 214 mounted within the lower, reaction chamber 104. A cooling fluid, such as liquid water, an organic liquid, such as methanol or ethanol, or another liquid or gas, is introduced into the heat-exchange-tubing coil 212 through a first port 214 into the lower chamber 104 and is expelled from the heat-exchange-tubing coil 212 through a second port 216 in the lower, reaction chamber 104. Thus, heat produced by the exothermic water-reduction reaction can be drawn off by a cooling liquid or gas and circulated through a heat-consuming component or device.
[0015] FIG. 3 shows the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator displayed in FIG. 1 rotated 90 degrees to the left, in a semi-cutaway view. Additional components first shown in FIG. 3 include a by-product-recovery-and-reacto- r drain 302 and a formula-feed plug 304. The by-product-recovery-and-react- or drain 302 allows, in one embodiment, aluminum-hydroxide slurry to be removed from the lower chamber 104. The formula-feed plug 304 can be opened to introduce aqueous solution, such as aqueous sodium hydroxide, into the upper chamber 102. The formula-feed plug is, of course, sealed with an 0-ring or other type of annular sealing device.
[0016] FIG. 4 shows a top-down view of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator shown in FIG. 1. The disposition of the manual relief valve 110, upper-chamber pressure gauge 116 and upper-chamber temperature gauge 120, fluid-level indicator 202, pressure relief valves 106 and 108, static control tube and valve 208, and the formula-feed valve 114 are clearly shown in vertical projection in FIG. 4.
[0017] FIG. 5 shows a reductant vessel employed in a second embodiment of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator. In the second embodiment, a single cylindrical-section-shaped chamber is employed primarily for generating heat. The reductant is placed in a reductant vessel 500 which can be controlled to expose the reductant to aqueous solution in order to initiate the heat and gaseous-fuel generation reaction. The reductant vessel comprises an outer canister 502 and an inner canister 504, both supported by a rotatable shaft 506 mechanically interconnected with a handle 508. A threaded, upper portion of the shaft 512 passes through a rotating threaded nut 510 to allow the outer canister 502 supported on a shaft to be tightened against the inner surface of chamber 514. An 0-ring seal is fitted into a groove 516 in order to seal the chamber from the external environment. The inner canister 504 is rotated relative to the outer canister 502 by rotation of the handle 508. The inner canister 504 includes slot-like apertures 520-523 and the outer canister also includes slot-like apertures 524-527. The reductant is placed into the inner canister 504 which is then inserted into the outer canister, and the reductant vessel comprising the inner and outer canister is then held in position by threading the shaft 512 into the rotating threaded nut 510. Initially, the apertures of the inner canister are not aligned with the apertures of the outer canister, preventing ingress of aqueous solution into the inner canister. When the handle is rotated by a small, fixed angle of rotation, the slots of the inner canister and the outer canister become aligned, allowing ingress of aqueous solution and initiation of the water-reduction reaction.
[0018] Both the two-chamber heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator shown in FIGS. 1-4, and a single-chamber heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator that represents a second embodiment, use an exothermic chemical reaction to generate heat and gaseous fuel. A useful exothermic reaction is that of aluminum metal with water, the chemical equation for which is shown below: 1 Al + 3 H 2 O Al ( OH ) 3 + 3 2 H 2
[0019] This oxidation/reduction, or redox, reaction produces prodigious amounts of heat and liberates hydrogen gas. In general, an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide is employed in this reaction so that the layer of aluminum hydroxide that forms on the surface of aluminum metal is solvated and constantly removed from the surface of the aluminum-metal reductant to allow the aluminum-oxidation and water-reduction reaction to proceed at a vigorous pace. In addition, reaction rates and completeness of the reaction have been found to be more easily controlled and improved by employing a platinum-metal catalyst in the lower chamber, to facilitate reduction of water. In many applications, a few ounces of platinum metal are sufficient to improve rate and completion characteristics. Furthermore, the by-product slurry that is collected from the reaction chamber following oxidation of the aluminum reductant and be filtered to remove AL(OH).sub.3, and the resulting filtered solution reconstituted for reuse by adding approximately 20% of the amount of sodium hydroxide originally used to prepare the initial aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. The ability to reuse the by-product slurry motivates a third embodiment comprising a continuous-feed heat-and-gaseous-fuel in which by-product slurry may be continuously removed, filtered, and re-introduced into the system, along with continuous resupply of the aluminum reductant. Although the above-described reaction has shown potential for both economic and commercial feasibility for portable, remote applications and for many personal, residential, and small-business applications, many other types of exothermic, gaseous fuel-producing reactions may be used. For example, other elemental metals may be employed to reduce water, including magnesium.
[0020] FIGS. 6A-J illustrate feedback control of the water-reduction reaction that proceeds within the lower chamber of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 6A, the two-chamber embodiment may initially have aqueous solution 602 sequestered within the upper chamber 604 and cooling fluid coursing through the heat-exchange-tubing coil 606, indicated by the input 608 and output 610 arrows in FIGS. 6A-J. Initially, the static control valve is closed, as indicated by the "X" symbol 612 in FIG. 6A. Once the formula-feed and static-control valves are opened to allow aqueous solution into the lower chamber 614, as shown in FIG. 6B, the water-reduction reaction is initiated, with the formula-feed control valve closed following introduction of the aqueous solution into the lower chamber. As shown in FIG. 6C, this reaction produces hydrogen gas 616 that is expelled through the gas outlet 618. If, for one of various reasons, the output of hydrogen gas is restricted or blocked, as shown by the "X" symbol 620 in FIG. 6D, hydrogen-gas pressure begins to build in the lower chamber 614. As shown in FIG. 6D, the level of aqueous solution within the lower chamber 614 begins to lower as aqueous solution is expelled from the lower chamber through the static control tube 622 back into the upper chamber 604. As the water-reduction reaction proceeds, with the outlet of hydrogen gas restricted or blocked, additional aqueous solution is expelled from the lower chamber 614 back into the upper chamber 604. If the restriction or blockage of hydrogen-gas output is removed, as shown in FIG. 6G, then the pressure of hydrogen gas within the lower chamber 614 decreases, and aqueous solution again flows through the static-control tube 622 back into the lower reaction chamber 614 from the upper chamber 604. As hydrogen gas continues to be removed from the lower reaction chamber, the level of aqueous solution returns to an equilibrium level, as shown in FIG. 6H. Thus, by simple feedback control, the hydrogen-gas pressure within the reaction chamber can never exceed a safe, relatively low maximum pressure. The rate of water reduction to hydrogen gas may also be controlled purely by the rate of heat removal from the reaction chamber. As shown in FIGS. 6I-J, an increase in the flow rate of cooling fluid through the heat-exchange-tubing coil 606, indicated in FIG. 6J by the large input and output arrows 624 and 626, respectively, slows the water-reduction reaction and therefore decreases the output of hydrogen gas. The rate of water-reduction in the single-chamber embodiment is fully controlled by controlling the rate of heat extraction from the reaction chamber.
[0021] The many various embodiments of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator, two of which are described above, provide a safe, simple, and commercially feasible source of both heat and gaseous fuel. As noted above, the heat and gaseous-fuel generator is feedback controlled to prevent runaway reaction and overproduction of heat and/or hydrogen gas. It should be noted that this control is maintained without complex electromechanical devices and without the need for electrical power. This further enables the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator to be portable and to be used in remote applications, where electrical power is not available. When reduced metallic aluminum is used as the reductant for reducing water, and the chemical reaction described above, the resulting aluminum hydroxide, produced as an end-product of the reaction, can be removed from the reaction chamber, dried, and sold as a commercially useful by-product, providing revenue to offset the costs of the sodium hydroxide and aluminum metal. In many cases, the aluminum metal can be obtained at low or no cost, as scrap metal, beverage containers, and other aluminum waste.
[0022] Additional compounds may be introduced into the aqueous solution in order to increase the solubility of by-products. As an example, ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid ("EDTA") can be used to maintain magnesium hydroxide in solution when elemental magnesium is employed as a reductant.
[0023] There are many different potential uses for various embodiments of the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator, described above. Applications include production of hydrogen gas in remote locations, where electrical power is unavailable, for use as cooking fuel, fuel for heaters, fuel for generators, and fuel for distilling water. The heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator may be used in marine environments for producing fuel for driving boats and ships, and the water produced by combustion of the hydrogen gas may be recovered for various other uses, including for steam to drive turbines or to cook fish. The portable heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator can be used for remote recreational applications, including lighting, battery charging, cooking, heating recreational vehicles, and may be packaged into small, self-containing canisters for campers, hikers, mountain climbers, and other such outdoor enthusiasts to supply heat, fuel, and clean water. There are emergency back-up applications for the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator for organizations such as hospitals, businesses, fire departments, etc. Sodium hydroxide and aluminum metal have extremely long half-lives, no toxic by-products are produced, and there are no moving parts or electromechanical systems to fail or degrade, so that the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator is extremely robust and reliable over long periods of time. Additional applications include employing hydrogen gas from the generator for lighter-than-air vessels, such as hydrogen balloons and zeppelins, for fueling motorized vehicles, either directly, or through hydrogen fuel cells, for agricultural uses, including gas-driven pumps, grow-lamps, feeders, humidifiers, and other such uses.
[0024] Although the present invention has been described in terms of a particular embodiment, it is not intended that the invention be limited to this embodiment. Modifications within the spirit of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, many different shapes, sizes, and styles of reactive vessels may be employed to produce to heat-and-gaseous-fuel generators of different shapes and size. A large variety of different materials may be used to produce the vessels and various components and features described above. Care must be taken so that, for example, the heat-exchange tubing is not reactive in aqueous sodium hydroxide, or whatever aqueous solution is used, so that corrosion of components is not a problem. As discussed above, the heat and hydrogen produced by the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator may be employed for many different uses, and many different types of exothermic chemical reactions may be employed to generate heat and gaseous fuels, including hydrogen. In general, when the above-described As mentioned above, alternative embodiments employ continuous recharging of both the aqueous sodium-hydroxide solution and aluminum-metal reductant, with the by-product slurry continuously removed, filtered, and re-introduced into the heat-and-gaseous-fuel generator.
[0025] The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description; they are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications and to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents:
* * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very nice find chipotle_pickle...
'chipotle_pickle' .......
you forgot to post that on the raging bull website, nice job.
Patent application published. Looks like it's all over.
1 - They neglected to pull their patent application, and it published. The fuel is Aluminum or Magnesium. Application number 20040205997. (Someone else caught that for me.)
2 - The website has been down for months.
3 - Nevada no longer has 2 listings for them. The one listing it does have is the older one that was listed as MD (Merged Dissolved).
The investors ought to read the patent application. i wonder if anyone would have invested in the company if they had been able to see the patent app.
The website is back down again.
They stopped making SEC filings. They haven't yet notified Nevada of their change of officers and delinquent with their registration fees. (See http://sos.state.nv.us/corpsrch.asp) They have been in default on a $10k note for years. Think about what bad shape you need to be in that you would rather report that you are in default on a loan than make good on a $10k obligation.
Remember when they filed (for the nth time) for their first patent?
http://www.forrelease.com/D20030416/sfw101.P1.04162003174125.25368.html
Shouldn't the application be visible now? It's not. Because they never did file that patent application. And rather than clarify that, they stopped filing reports with the SEC.
In a year, their DNS registration will expire. In less than a year, Nevada ought to dissolve them. And the die-hards will still think that the technology was some great achievement that was managed badly, rather than a highschool chem experiment gone public.
Anything doing here???
Website back up.
Who contacted the nursery? I emailed them and didn't hear back. It's hard to call during business hours since they are in the same timezone as me. Can someone get an update? Also, please ask what they are expecting to pay for heat once they have the device, compared to what they pay now, 10%? 1,000%?
Website down today. Anyone called nursery?
It's about time I would expect that the nursery would have been told what the systems going to cost them, supposing there was an effort to cost it out to them. Anyone called the nursery for an update? If not, I will.
The website is down today. There isn't a lot of time left.
Rager,
"Just seams wierd to see the same harping over and over about the cost, maybe stuck in a time warp?"
More like if the cost to produce hydrogen is too high to markets will be smaller and smaller tending to the non-existient. That point needs to continue to be made since the numbers do matter so profoundly.
"or maybe just refuses to understand there is a SELLABLE by product that greatly reduces the cost of the energy from the hydrogen reactor.
OK...I will say it again
there is a by-product that when sold reduces the cost of the energy."
So what does the by-product sell for and what kind of processing must it undergo before sale? Does it require dehydration? Will somebody come and pick it up when you have sufficient tonnage? Do you ship it (hopefully not waterlogged) to a recycling center? What is the cycle cost for this part of the process?
Thanks,
Missed Chris's question, thanks for the reference. That matches what I got on the spreadsheet. Important thing to remember is to use comparable terms, equivalent heating energy and comparisons at Standard Temperature and Pressure (STP).
The by-product isn't worth much.
The company estimated in a filing in September that it would decrease the cost of the H2 by up to 25%. This doesn't change the fact their H2 is way too expensive.
A HYVR clone company started last year says that one of the uses of the byproduct is a soil treatment. So maybe that's why the nursery was targeted.
Just seams wierd to see the same harping over and over about the cost, maybe stuck in a time warp?
or maybe just refuses to understand there is a SELLABLE by product that greatly reduces the cost of the energy from the hydrogen reactor.
OK...I will say it again
there is a by-product that when sold reduces the cost of the energy.
get it? nah must be that time warp.
Dry fuels should ship and store better.
Liquid ones will be easier to control.
They key is that it's difficult to overcome a factor of 10 disadvantage in cost. For an energy application, you can't. For an educational lab, maybe you can. So why is HYVR going after lumberyards and nurseries when there is a proven market willing to pay more than 6 cents per cuft in educational labs? (I suspect there is a reason.)
Good post.
Now what needs to be figured into the equation is shipping/delivery. What does it cost to ship the dry chemicals in HREIs' formula vs any other fuel in its' ready to use state and how much energy will those dry chemicals produce vs the other. Got to assume there will be a local source for water of any quality.
An educational lab is going to pay a lot more for chemicals than an energy consumer.
The question is why HYVR always focused on high energy applications, not ed labs.
Propane vs H2 is liquids vs solids.
A gallon of propane is a pressurized liquid gallon. See:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/non-renewable/propane.html
Sorry for the "energy ant", but I've had no coffee yet and the doe.gov/kids/ pages were my reading level.
If everyone used metric, this wouldn't take so many conversion factors.
1 cuft = 7.5 gallons
1 gal liquid propane = 270 gal vapor at stp (room temp and pressure)
So 1 gal propane liquid = 36 cuft propane at stp
So the equivalent cost for the propane is 4.5 cents per cuft.
So if H2 and propane packed the same punch, that would make the H2 at 6 cents per cuft only a little (30%) more expensive than the propane. But propane packs a lot more punch.
heat of combustion of propane = 2200 kJ/mol
Heat of combustion of hydrogen = 285kJ/mole
The propane has 7.7X the energy of hydrogen per mole, and so per cuft at stp. So you need 46.2 cents worth of HERI Hydrogen to compare to 4.5 cents worth of propane.
This is pretty much the same as what we came up with when we went through the electrolysis comparison. If you want to compare to other methods of getting Hydrogen, this is 5X as expensive, to other methods of getting energy, 10X.
4MR4
From the University of Alabama Purchasing Dept.
T031311 Current HYDROGEN, 99.999%PURE, SIZE T, 300 CU.FT.CYL. $36.67 Carol Smith, 8-5037
That works out to .12223 cents per cu/ft.
Now, please explain why you think this company has a product that is too expensive.
4MR4
The 6 cents cu/ft seems fairly cheap when you look at the price of propane which has an average $1.63 gal. and when you do a cu/ft gal conversion you get 1 ft3 = 7.48 gal.
Am I missing something?
I tried to do an equivalent to natural gas but that seems to be measured in MMBTU and I got tired of looking. <g>
oh not I get it,
mockloudly?
Chris,
Thanks.
To expand the dialogue a little bit...
A H generator will fulfill either one or two purposes.
1) To produce h to power a fuel cell (in which case the added cost of FC far outstrips the cost of installing a PV array - unless perhaps in mobile applications where a KwH is worth about 4X more than in via the grid). In either case, neither meets the criteria of being glad for "energy at any cost" category.
2) To produce hydrogen for combustion. This could make more sense. Maybe. In some areas, like Haiti, massive deforestation to produce charcoal for fuel has led to massive flooding, mudslides, etc... Does hydrogen fuel make more sense when it costs six cents/cu ft (STP)? Actually, not really when you consider and factor in the cycle dynamics of any metal based h producing system. Ask yourself (and please do prove me wrong if this phrasing seems overly prejudicial), "If I have to truck in reactant and X cost why am I not better off trucking in a VERY much more energy dense fuel like propane, diesel, etc?".
And too, with this scenario, if h is to be combusted, why not go straight PV to end use through resistance heating? Am I missing anything here?
Thanks in advance,
>There are plenty of places on this planet that would consider energy at any price a boon.
Show me one.
Where is HYVR's process less expensive than transporting in a direct combusion fuel alternative or providing electrons some other means?
I mean this sincerely.
If you think there is a market for "energy at any price" then let's look at that market niche.
For off-grid power, people are better off with diesel at a fifth the cost.
But for remote hydrogen production, for educational purposes mostly, the company's system might be a good fit. Of course, they never tried to sell there.
The company still pitches this as a solution for people who are on the grid.
What has the company ever done or said to convince anyone that their product is a good fit for any market? Pelto made wild claims about producing H2 without using any outside energy. The reformed company made it clear their process is expensive. Neither team was willing to apply for and publish a patent. Was there some other venue, besides their public statements, where they sold people the idea they had a viable, novel invention?
It's portable.
It's low pressure.
There are plenty of places on this planet that would consider energy at any price a boon.
It's my board. There will be no more name calling.
There will be no more repetitive posts. I'm tired of the same old tune.
Break my rules and you will be banned.
So it be known...
I have spoken and met with Mr. Rosenberg many times
I have a great deal of respect for him and he is very aware of this. I in fact called him when he resigned to further pursue other prior business dealings. I thanked him for aleviating
H.E.R.I. of some of the past ills it had accumulated due to
those that ran the company before him. I was sadden that he told me I was the only one that bothered to thank him.
So with that said, I can not imagine what pickled chitpile meant in his prior post. Nor do I care.
Forget the stock, tell us about the technology.
Why do you think the technology is any good?
Why do you think other people say the technology is nogood?
What would it take to change your mind about the technology?
Answer any one of these and I promise to stop trying to convince you how great the pizza man is.
4mr4 I think you might wanna look at the chart on hyvr. This puppy has seen some very nice spikes from this level for those whom are patient. I have been a member of ihub since 2001 and have been trading for a few years more and can promise you rager is one of the best traders I have met. There seems to be a few people from the land down under that have a rather large chip on there shoulder about this stock and I cant seem to figure out why. Anyway as for being a bagholder this stock is far from dead wait and see. Heres a chart to clarify the historical price spikes for you:
> Put it this way...
if you were not coming off like a jerk I might take
some time and teach you about trading stocks.
You are proving how clueless you are by your last post.
So, begin by teaching me about how you did with trading HYVR.
Beginning to stop being a Jerk starts at home.
It's not an empty insinuation.
You were vocally, and according to your OWN postings, buying more and more HYVR. Hey, you got your dork handed to you in a croaker sack, that can happen and it's part of learning.
So, unless I missed some fantastic spike in the stock price that allowed you to dump you were among the bagholders, weren't you?
Where was your DD on HYVR?
It's ok, I've made larger errors and it's early to ask you to admit any of your own.
"Denial" it's just not a river in Egypt you know.
See ya cant stop with the empty insinuations in refering to
the "That the bloodbath you took on HYVR"
again it really is none of your business.
as for being in the right place for a P/D?
put INNI in the search box on top
look at the DD I had done in February.
takes patience and know how.
stop being an ass ...TIA
Which means what?
That the bloodbath you took on HYVR is offset by your being in the right place for a P/D?
Thanks anyway but I'd rather make my living by some means other than sucking dollars out of the dim-witted. And for that you can be grateful.
Show me any "empty insinuation" that I've made.
Take care
Really tired of your empty insinuations, Put it this way...
if you were not coming off like a jerk I might take
some time and teach you about trading stocks.
You are proving how clueless you are by your last post.
hint look at INNI today
then get lost
That says it all.
Mark it off on your 1040 as "Education Hard Won"
4MR4, Actually I am amazed after all this time you...
still dont get it, its about the technology to me.
as for how much $
None of your business......!
and since I find your question insulting I will no longer respond to you.
Dollars are not the only measure.
It's easy to be right most of the time on a tech startup by saying "It will fail.". Works 95% of the time.
But with perpetual motion machine, water as fuel, and all the other Einstein Was Wrong Inc., it's right 100% of the time.
So, let's assume that you've been right all along and the critics have been wrong.
How do we measure that? Dollars are a good way to keep score?
What has my viewpoint cost or benefitted me?
Answer: $0. I've been neither long nor short the stock
What has your viewpoint cost or benefitted you?
cp
drop me an email at maxmegabucks@yahoo.com
The email you provided earlier did not work.
there will be one vetting question.
thanks
Followers
|
8
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
611
|
Created
|
05/13/01
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |