Replies to post #53392 on Hartcourt Companies (fka HRCT)

[The_Free_Nebula]

They are all going to cost share...Even HRCT recognizes the dilutive effects of the acquisitions and said so in the PR...

[brdsng]

Re: SEC case. No one is more disappointed than I at current share price but a couple of notes on the SEC case. First, it may not be in HRCT's interest (or ability) to comment on the case's progress. Second, none of us know what the SEC is seeking (i.e. what potential penalties and damages beyond initial liabiitlity). This combined with relative strength of the case determines if and at what price this can be settled. Third, wouldn't be so sanguine that $1.3mm is upper limit of liability (would guess auditors required this as "reasonable" reserve against likely potential cost).

[commoname]

YES, AGREED....

I'm not so sure I like our new ceo....While she is "consolidating" our gains and worrying about the accounting we forfeit OPPORTUNITY...What might some of these little outfits cost down the line when Miss Hartwick is "ready " to continue.So long as these entities are in fact accretive, then fine...get them while the gettings hot...

OF COURSE THEY WILL NEED TO BE TIED TOGETHER AS DOES ANY BUNDLE THAT'S ALL OVER THE PLACE....BUT..
Lost opportunity is the bigger sin....Nothing can compare to OPPORTUNITY and that is now....

And it doesn't go unnoticed that the last quarters release was on the last allowable day...and no news on this SEC to me smacks of a certain callousness ...and that she doesn't own but a token of our shares , as last reported in a post here..Of course, the new marketing company has also indicated that they will be disinclined to hold our hand and will be reporting only substantive information, when they see fit...not good...Some will applaud this new posture, but I see it as authoritative posture that denies just who in fact owns this company...We are entitled to information when it's there not when they choose to release it ...