Have you done the burn-rate vs. dilution math?
Assuming the worst-case scenario based on the Q1 burn-rate, I think they might have another month or so. Of course, this would be much more accurate if we calculated from the Q2 financials, which we're still anxiously awaiting.
In a good case, they might be able to last until the end of the year.
As much as people like to slam on the management, I'm pretty sure they've got enough sense to have done enough dilution to cover a few months ahead. They had to know that the A/S increase was going to hurt their ability to sell shares, so they did their heavy selling within a month of that increase to get it over with.
Of course, they might have taken steps to reduce the burn-rate with some cost cutting. It also needs to be considered that they might be receiving a revenue stream from services provided to 141, so both companies' financials are of importance to everyone.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
