News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cleverrox

08/13/08 7:41 AM

#2873 RE: ambulance_blues #2872

Great post ambulance. The numbers speak for themselves. Q4 may appears to be a historically strong quarter even without capacity additions. I'm looking for a blockbuster Q4 this year as well in terms of revenue and hopefully EPS. Only 4.5 months to wait now...





icon url

Y B

08/13/08 8:12 AM

#2874 RE: ambulance_blues #2872

I agree partially. Doubling the finished goods is indeed simplistic.

I think you should look at the difference in inventory compared to the previous period(s) so that you would see the inventory being built up.

If you do that then you will see that this last quarter something "extraordinary" happend : there was a large inventory being built up. 785400-85000$, even if you set the 785400 against the highest inventory ever of 320000$ (or around that ?), you see that you still have an unusual inventory of 465.000. If you double that you have more or less 1 million in sales. That is for me the minimum amount they "missed" this quarter.

But indeed great quarter ahead ! Thanks for the interesting data !
icon url

gilead23

08/14/08 8:03 AM

#2880 RE: ambulance_blues #2872

ab and inventory

This is a very good analysis however I disagree with your conclusions for a couple of reasons.

First while there is no direct historical correlation between inventory and subsequent quarterly results none of those previous numbers really represent an abberation in finished goods numbers. This quarters numbers did and were more than 2 times the historical peak. Its true that FG is not guaranteed to drop this Q however if you are basing your inventory analysis on historical numbers you would have to assume finished goods drops roughly 500k just to get down to the previous historical peak which would add 1 to 1.2 million in results.

In addition this quarters inventory level coincides with a sudden dramatic drop in sales in the quarter that experienced the inventory build. The previous cases don't seem to show that pattern. In fact it appears those inventory builds were associated with increasing sales as you note. The difference in the two periods is the company is effectively maxed out in terms of capacity. My guess on this is that previously an inventory build was no big deal because they had lots of capacity. They could afford to build product 2 months ahead and let it sit. Today they are peaked out in terms of capacity so literally an order that doesn't ship prevents other revenue from being recognized because they cannot produce another order. That may explain why inventory builds did not have revenue impact in the building quarter but do now.