News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Traderfan

07/08/08 4:33 PM

#53202 RE: Imperial Whazoo #53197

Your theory again makes no sense because if that would be the case why would Paul tell us 6 months ago that it's no problem at all for SPZI that Peng and He left? So either your theory is nonsense or he simple lied correct?

I'm just thinking about your volume theory in pink sheet companies and that one wasn't too close as well eh.
icon url

GekkoTheGreat

07/08/08 4:53 PM

#53203 RE: Imperial Whazoo #53197

Well, please don't challenge me with code writing ability. I would have no problem showing you just how wrong you are.

Your entitled to your opinion of course, but a lot of people take what you say as fact and not opinion. There has been nothing from the company to back up your view.

If indeed it is true, then I believe things to be more dire than previous (if that is even possible). This means again the possibility of delayed revenues.

Anyway, who would be doing the rewriting? More contractors? That's what is really funny. Everyone here that thinks this thing is so disruptive and revolutionary has to step back and realize that it was written by external contractors in the first place! That means if they can do it, so can anyone else. Folks, this whole thing is so freaking fragile it's almost unbelievable.

I would say it's safe to that all your money is lost (IMO). Hope you have other capital gains to write off this year.