Have you seen the demos? Do you know how data was collected before the software was stolen and how data is now collected? Programmers here know there is a difference. And this difference is not just one simple line of code.
Thus the need for litigation. Sorry you just cannot seem to grasp the obvious about the code my friend. Try reading some of the posts by Imperial Whazoo if you dare. And then you might even take MC up on his offer to get the transcripts.
Nah, nevermind let's just keep watching the L2's. Gonna be a nice show soon, IMO.
IW gave reasons why STV2 was re written and evidence of it. Sorry you missed it. That SWARM could be rewritten from scratch with patent issues might be correct. But different systems have already been engineered that function well and will be used by 141 Capital soon enough. And your statement that Spooz is doing nothing except suing has already been met with evidence to the contrary via the press releases citing Spooz Technologies joint venture with SBF Market Systems' SMCC. Also , now that STV2 has been re written you'll no doubt be met with news citing revenue bearing deals surprisingly soon. milo3