News Focus
News Focus
icon url

clarity789

05/16/08 7:26 PM

#110415 RE: Art2Gecko #110410

And lose copyright protections? That wouldn't be very bright, but thanks for the suggestion gecko.

What you really are trying to do is get me to post the formula's - something hundreds of posters have tried to get me to do.

Unrequited envy is such an ugly thing... all anyone has to do is pick up a few books on fibonacci theory, develop a formula, and then test it openly on the boards for nearly 2 years.

If you are willing to do that, maybe I'll share my secrets. Until then the answer is no
icon url

bob41

05/16/08 7:28 PM

#110416 RE: Art2Gecko #110410

LOL. You have the responsiblity to disprove what he posts. If you can not......
icon url

camper9

05/16/08 8:03 PM

#110447 RE: Art2Gecko #110410

My detailed calculations show that his prognostications are accurate approximately half the time, i.e., about the same rate as random guessing.

If I were he, I also wouldn't want to disclose what is little better than a random number generator.

      ¶ So here's a question. By now some/most of you have seen Clarity789's posts regarding his own proprietary fibonacci calcualtion of some sort. Sometimes they're uncannily accurate, sometimes they're not.
icon url

TEX

05/16/08 9:31 PM

#110511 RE: Art2Gecko #110410

I'd say that's opinion, not data.

Regardless of how much weight I might personally grant those posts, it's not "data" in the sense of pps, RSI, Williams%, etc...